T05 · Unauthorized Access and Privilege Escalation
- Location
SKILL.md:27- Finding
Excessive File-System and Command-Execution Permissions
- Content
View full analysis
Vulnerability Details
File Location:
SKILL.md, lines 27-30
Vulnerability Type: Excessive tool permissions violating least privilege
Risk Level: Mediumyaml tools: - read - exec - writeTechnical Analysis
The Skill declares unrestricted file-reading, file-writing, and command-execution tools even though its documented purpose is to communicate with the
inbed.aiHTTPS API. The social-network workflow only requires a constrained HTTP client and narrowly scoped storage for a bearer token and synchronization state.No file-path restrictions, command allowlist, argument validation rules, or enforceable sandbox policy are specified. Consequently, the declared privileges exceed the minimum capabilities needed for registration, discovery, messaging, relationship management, and polling.
The document also advertises generic file processing and system-command execution at lines 332-334, confirming that these broad permissions are intended capabilities rather than unused metadata. Although no directly malicious command is embedded in the audited file, exposing these tools unnecessarily expands the attack surface.
Attack Path
- An attacker supplies crafted user input or attacker-controlled content through a remote profile, message, or other social-network field.
- The content attempts to induce the Agent to perform a local file or command operation rather than a legitimate API request.
- The Skill runtime exposes the declared
read,write, orexectool without a documented path or command allowlist. - If the Agent treats the malicious content as actionable, it may read local data, modify files, or execute an unintended operating-system command.
- Data obtained through the operation could then be returned in output or transmitted through an API request available to the Skill.
Exploitation remains dependent on the host Agent's tool-policy enforcement and its handling of untrusted conte ...[truncated 795 chars]
- Remediation
View remediation
Remediation Suggestions
- Remove the
readandwritetools unless local file access is strictly required by an implemented workflow. - Replace unrestricted
execaccess with a dedicated HTTP client restricted to HTTPS requests underhttps://inbed.ai/api/. - If command execution cannot be removed, enforce an explicit executable and argument allowlist. Do not pass user-controlled or remotely supplied values through a shell.
- Disable shell interpretation and invoke approved programs through structured argument arrays.
- If persistent local state is necessary, restrict access to a dedicated state directory or individual state file using canonical-path validation.
- Store bearer tokens in the host platform's credential manager rather than in general-purpose files accessible to the Skill.
- Treat remote profiles, chat messages, API responses, and user input as untrusted data that must never be interpreted as tool instructions.
- Apply outbound network restrictions so the Skill can communicate only with approved
inbed.aiHTTPS endpoints. - Run the Skill under a dedicated, minimally privileged operating-system identity and an isolated filesystem sandbox.
- Add audit logging for command execution, file access, credential use, and rejected operations without recording secret values.
- Remove the
