Back to skill

Security audit

Azure管理专业版

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This Azure administration skill is not plainly malicious, but it requests broad cloud-changing authority and credential handling without enough scoping or safeguards.

Review this skill before installing. Use it only in Azure subscriptions you control, prefer least-privilege or managed identity credentials, do not store client secrets in local project files, and require an explicit plan or dry run before any deploy or optimization command changes resources or costs.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • MCP Tool PoisoningHidden Instructions, Unicode Deception, Parameter Description Injection
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Findings (5)

Intent-Code Divergence

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The skill says API keys should not be hardcoded, but also instructs that credentials are stored in a local configuration file. That contradiction can normalize insecure secret handling and lead operators to place long-lived Azure credentials in plaintext files, which are commonly leaked through source control, backups, or host compromise.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

The skill description uses broad trigger language such as security detection, compliance audit, quality check, and encryption protection without tight activation boundaries. In an agent environment, this can cause the skill to be invoked for loosely related requests and expose powerful read/write/exec behavior in contexts where the user did not clearly intend Azure administration actions.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding

The capability scope lists an extremely broad set of keywords, including generic terms like 'Use', 'when', 'quality check', 'automation', and 'workflow'. Such expansive matching increases accidental activation risk and can cause an agent to route unrelated requests into a skill that supports command execution and cloud-changing operations.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The deployment examples generate templates, write files, and deploy infrastructure but do not prominently warn about creating or modifying cloud resources or overwriting local output paths. In this context, the skill advertises exec and write tools, so users or agents may trigger costly or destructive changes without understanding the side effects.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

The optimization example includes an apply-style flag for recommendations without a clear safety warning about changes to live environments. Even with '--dry-run' shown nearby, presenting apply semantics in cost optimization can mislead agents or operators into approving resource modifications that affect availability, performance, or billing.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.