Back to skill

Security audit

宠物日常照护计划台

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a simple pet-care planning skill with disclosed boundaries and no evidence of hidden code, data access, persistence, or credential use.

Before installing, understand that this skill can provide general pet-care planning only. It should not replace a veterinarian for vaccines, deworming, medication, illness, or urgent symptoms; use it with pet details you are comfortable sharing in the conversation.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding

The trigger examples include very broad everyday phrases such as pet-related topics that may appear in ordinary conversation without a clear intent to invoke the skill. This can cause unintended activation, causing the assistant to steer users into the skill unexpectedly and potentially provide domain-specific guidance when the user was only chatting generally.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
85% confidence
Finding

The manifest fields, trigger examples, and user instructions all assume Chinese-language interaction, but the file does not state that the skill is Chinese-only or provide any language/locale opt-in. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a natural-language policy violation unless the locale restriction is explicitly justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.