T07 · Tool Hijacking and Spoofing
Error
- Location
code-review-assistant.sh:19- Finding
Fabricated Code Review and Security Scan Results
- Content
View full analysis
Vulnerability Details
File Location:
code-review-assistant.sh:19-74andcode-review-assistant.sh:77-104
Vulnerability Type: Tool output spoofing
Risk Level: HighVulnerable Code
bash review) if [ -z "$TARGET" ]; then echo -e "${YELLOW}Usage: code-review-assistant review <file-or-directory>${NC}" exit 1 fi echo "📁 Reviewing: $TARGET" echo "" cat << 'REPORT' ### Code Review Report #### ⚠️ Issues Found ##### High Priority 1. **Security: Potential SQL Injection** - File: example.js - Line: 45 ```javascript const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;Recommendation: Use parameterized queries
Medium Priority
-
Error Handling: Missing try-catch
- File: example.js
- Line: 23
javascript const data = JSON.parse(response);Recommendation: Add error handling
-
Best Practice: Hardcoded Secret
- File: example.js
- Line: 67
javascript const API_KEY = "sk-1234567890";Recommendation: Use environment variables
Low Priority
- Style: Use const instead of let
- Style: Add JSDoc comments
- Performance: Consider caching
Summary
Type Count Security 1 Error Handling 1 Best Practices 2 Style 2 Recommendation
Fix high priority issues before merging. Consider addressing medium priority items in next iteration.
REPORT
text echo -e "${GREEN}✅ Review complete!${NC}" ;;text The corresponding `diff` implementation similarly combines a real command with a fabricated analysis: ```bash diff) echo "📊 Analyzing git diff..." echo "" if command -v git &> /dev/null; then git diff --stat 2>/dev/null || echo "Not a git repository" fi cat << 'DIFF_REPORT' ### Changes Summary | File | Additions | Deletions | |------|-----------|-----------| | src/utils.js | +15 | -3 | | s ...[truncated 2485 chars]-
- Remediation
View remediation
Remediation Suggestions
- Replace all static findings with results derived from actual inspection of the requested file, directory, or Git diff.
- Validate that the target exists, is readable, and is of a supported type before beginning analysis.
- Generate each finding from a concrete rule match and include the real relative file path, line range, relevant source excerpt, and rule identifier.
- Ensure diff summaries and issue counts are computed exclusively from the current repository and selected revision range.
- Return a nonzero exit status when analysis cannot be performed, the target is invalid, or an internal analyzer fails. Do not print “Review complete” after a failed or skipped analysis.
- Clearly mark any demonstration or placeholder output as synthetic and disable it in production and CI execution paths.
- Add regression tests using clean and deliberately vulnerable fixtures to verify that results change with source content and that clean inputs do not receive fabricated findings.
- Until real analysis is implemented, remove or revise the documentation claims that the tool performs automatic bug detection, security scanning, and complexity analysis.