Aiseact

AI Search Enhancement and Cross-verification Tool. ALWAYS USE when performing ANY web search, regardless of who initiated it - whether user explicitly asks,...

This is optional. You control when to use it.

Quick Start

Invoke

"Use AISEACT to search [topic]" "用AISEACT搜索 [主题]"

Override

"Skip AISEACT" / "不用AISEACT" "Include [source name]" / "包含 [来源]"

Priority

P0: Official/Primary - Gov sites, company filings, academic P1: Authoritative - AP, Reuters, Caixin, BBC P2: Professional - Industry journals, reports P3: UGC/Blogs - Zhihu, Jianshu (verify) P4: Content farms - Baijiahao, clickbait

Quick Rules

1. Policy -> site:gov.cn
2. China companies -> site:cninfo.com.cn
3. HK companies -> site:hkexnews.hk
4. Tech -> docs > GitHub > StackOverflow
5. Fact-check -> Snopes / PolitiFact

Sources

Reliable

• Intl: AP, Reuters, BBC
• China Finance: Caixin, Yicai
• China Society: Zaobao, SCMP, Initium

Avoid

• Content farms: Baijiahao, Toutiao
• Political propaganda: Guancha, Epoch Times
• Biased: Breitbart, InfoWars

Workflow

Phase 0: Plan - decompose, predict sources Phase 1: Broad - multiple keywords, filter P4 Phase 2: Assess - rate authority, find gaps Phase 3: Target - site: for official, filetype:pdf for docs Phase 4: Verify - multi-source support? conflicts? Phase 5: Output - cite sources, note uncertainty Phase 6: Format - [source]-[url]-[primary/secondary]

Search Syntax

• Gov: site:gov.cn
• China A-share: site:cninfo.com.cn
• HK: site:hkexnews.hk
• US: site:sec.gov
• GitHub: site:github.com
• Docs: filetype:pdf

References

• quick-reference.md - Quick lookup (recommended)
• unreliable-sources.md - Detailed ratings
• authority-sources.md - Scenario-based

Checklist

• Authentic sources for key info?
• P4 content farms filtered?
• Sources cited with URLs?
• Uncertainty noted?

AISEACT - for quality-critical searches