Back to skill

Security audit

Software Team Conflict Patterns

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a Markdown-only coaching skill for software team conflict analysis, with no evidence of hidden execution, data access, persistence, or credential handling.

Reasonable to install if you want structured advice for recurring software or game team conflict. Treat its archetype labels as rough framing, not facts about a person, and be careful with workplace escalation or HR-sensitive situations.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
87% confidence
Finding

This markdown instruction says to translate guidance into "safer team-language," and the entire reference is written as an English-only operating document, but it provides no user choice or opt-in for language/locale. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy issue.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Vague Triggers

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
79% confidence
Finding

The manifest description says to use the skill when someone describes a teammate, lead, stakeholder, client, or collaborator creating friction or slowing decisions, which is a wide and natural class of everyday requests. It does not give explicit trigger phrases, exclusions, or narrow context boundaries, so the activation scope is somewhat ambiguous for when this skill should be invoked versus more general advice or coaching skills.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.