ClawHub
Back to skill

Security audit

职场高情商沟通润色/职场防背锅助手

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a plain text workplace communication skill that rewrites drafts and does not ask for system access, credentials, persistence, or external execution.

Before installing, consider that the skill is optimized for Chinese workplace messaging and may keep using its Chinese template even if a user prefers another language. Avoid pasting sensitive workplace details unless you are comfortable sharing them with the agent session.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (1)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding
The skill explicitly requires replies to use a fixed Chinese Markdown template, with no provision to adapt to the user's preferred language. This can reduce usability, cause misunderstandings for non-Chinese-speaking users, and create a prompt-quality issue where the assistant ignores user language context. In this workplace communication setting, the issue is not directly security-critical, but it is still a real cross-lingual policy/quality vulnerability.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.