Back to skill

Security audit

阳阳·支教志愿者智能体

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a Chinese writing-assistance skill for rural education volunteering, with no code execution, data access, persistence, or hidden authority.

Installers should expect this skill to shape responses toward warm Chinese-language rural education volunteer writing. If broad trigger activation is undesirable, the publisher could narrow the trigger terms, but no security-sensitive behavior was found.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

The trigger list includes broad terms such as '寄语' and '志愿者' that can appear in many benign conversations outside the intended rural-education context. This can cause unintended activation or routing, leading to prompt hijacking of normal conversations into the skill’s persona or accidental disclosure of skill-specific behavior.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
88% confidence
Finding

The description mandates Chinese-language behavior by default, which can override a user’s preferred language or system-level localization expectations. While not directly a security exploit, forced language behavior can degrade user control, create misleading outputs, and interfere with safe handling if users expect responses in another language.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.