Psyke SEO & GEO Audit

v1.0.0

Produce a branded Psyke SEO & GEO audit deck for any website. Use when asked to run an SEO audit, GEO audit, site audit, or website health check for a Psyke...

0· 130·0 current·0 all-time
byBeebee@beebeebot

Install

OpenClaw Prompt Flow

Install with OpenClaw

Best for remote or guided setup. Copy the exact prompt, then paste it into OpenClaw for beebeebot/psyke-audit.

Previewing Install & Setup.
Prompt PreviewInstall & Setup
Install the skill "Psyke SEO & GEO Audit" (beebeebot/psyke-audit) from ClawHub.
Skill page: https://clawhub.ai/beebeebot/psyke-audit
Keep the work scoped to this skill only.
After install, inspect the skill metadata and help me finish setup.
Use only the metadata you can verify from ClawHub; do not invent missing requirements.
Ask before making any broader environment changes.

Command Line

CLI Commands

Use the direct CLI path if you want to install manually and keep every step visible.

OpenClaw CLI

Bare skill slug

openclaw skills install psyke-audit

ClawHub CLI

Package manager switcher

npx clawhub@latest install psyke-audit
Security Scan
VirusTotalVirusTotal
Pending
View report →
OpenClawOpenClaw
Benign
medium confidence
Purpose & Capability
Name/description match the instructions: the SKILL.md and reference files describe how to crawl a site, score SEO/GEO metrics, build an index.html slide deck with Psyke branding. Nothing requested or included (no binaries, no env vars, no installers) is disproportionate to producing such a deck.
Instruction Scope
Instructions appropriately direct crawling, live AI queries, scoring, and building an HTML slide deck. Two operational details are underspecified: (1) the workflow references a separate 'frontend-slides' skill for viewport-base styles (dependency not declared), and (2) it expects use of browser/web_fetch and third-party LLMs (ChatGPT/Perplexity) — normal for this task but you should confirm the agent has explicit permission to use those tools. The skill also instructs creating files under ~/Developer and running git init which will write to the local filesystem (expected for a build task).
Install Mechanism
Instruction-only skill with no install spec and no code execution packages to fetch — this is low-risk from an install perspective. All theme and rubric files are provided in-repo as plaintext references.
Credentials
The skill declares no required environment variables or credentials, which matches the absence of an installer. However, the instructions reference optional Ahrefs ('MCP connected' or 'have Psyke provide') and deployment to Vercel — both of which typically require API keys/tokens. Those credentials are optional in the workflow but are not declared. Confirm how Ahrefs data will be supplied and whether any service tokens (Vercel, Ahrefs) will be needed or requested at runtime.
Persistence & Privilege
always is false and the skill is user-invocable; it does not request permanent presence or modify other skills. It does instruct creating local project files (index.html, README) which is normal for a generator skill.
Assessment
Before installing or running this skill, consider: (1) Ahrefs integration is optional but useful — ask how Ahrefs data will be provided and whether you'll need to supply an API key/token; the skill does not declare or store such credentials itself. (2) The SKILL.md references a 'frontend-slides' skill for base styles — verify that dependency or confirm the skill will work standalone. (3) The agent will crawl target websites and run live queries against ChatGPT/Perplexity — ensure you permit network activity and are comfortable with those services seeing query content. (4) The build steps write files under ~/Developer and run git init; expect local filesystem changes. (5) The output mentions deployment to Vercel but gives no deployment steps or token handling — if you want automatic deployment, confirm how credentials will be provided and stored. If any of these points are unacceptable, seek a version of the skill that explicitly declares required credentials and dependencies.

Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.

latestvk972zdep3zgngdjr3e4npn7cf983kjng
130downloads
0stars
1versions
Updated 1mo ago
v1.0.0
MIT-0

Psyke SEO & GEO Audit

Branded audit product for Psyke (psyke.co). Produces a scored, dark-mode slide deck covering technical SEO, GEO readiness, competitor benchmarking, and actionable recommendations.

Output

A single index.html file deployed to Vercel containing:

  • SEO Health score (out of 100)
  • GEO Readiness score (out of 100)
  • Scored breakdown by category
  • Issue slides with evidence and fixes
  • Competitor benchmark (when Ahrefs data available)
  • AI visibility test results
  • Prioritised action plan
  • Psyke CTA slide

References

Read these before building an audit:

  • references/scoring.md — scoring methodology (SEO + GEO rubrics)
  • references/psyke-theme.css — complete CSS theme (paste into <style>)
  • references/slide-structure.md — fixed slide order and design rules
  • references/geo-framework.md — GEO assessment process

Process

Phase 1: Data Collection

1. Technical Crawl (always)

- Fetch homepage, robots.txt, sitemap.xml
- Fetch 4-6 key inner pages (services, about, contact, sector pages)
- Use browser to evaluate each page for: title, meta description, canonical, H1s, H2s, H3s, schemas, OG tags, image alt text, viewport meta
- Check for soft 404s on common URL patterns
- Note the CMS/platform if identifiable

2. Ahrefs Data (when MCP connected)

Pull via Ahrefs MCP or have Psyke provide:
- Domain Rating
- Organic keyword count + top keywords
- Monthly organic traffic
- Referring domains count
- Google AI Overview citation count
- ChatGPT citation count
- Branded vs non-branded split (estimate)
- Same metrics for 2-3 competitors

3. AI Visibility Testing (always)

Run 5-8 queries through ChatGPT and/or Perplexity:
- "[client industry] + Australia" query
- "best [service/product]" query
- "how does [client service] work" query
- "[client] vs [competitor]" query
- Location-specific query
Record: was client mentioned? which competitors? what was cited?

Phase 2: Scoring

Apply the rubrics from references/scoring.md:

  1. Score each SEO category, noting specific evidence for each deduction
  2. Score each GEO category, noting specific evidence
  3. Calculate totals — do not round

Phase 3: Build the Deck

Setup:

cd ~/Developer
mkdir [client]-seo-audit
cd [client]-seo-audit
git init
echo "# [Client] SEO & GEO Audit" > README.md

Build index.html:

  1. Start with the viewport-base styles from the frontend-slides skill
  2. Paste the full Psyke theme CSS from references/psyke-theme.css
  3. Follow the slide structure from references/slide-structure.md exactly
  4. Include the SlidePresentation JavaScript class (keyboard nav, touch, progress bar, nav dots, intersection observer)

Font include:

<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Space+Grotesk:wght@400;500;600;700&display=swap" rel="stylesheet">

Key HTML patterns:

Title slide:

<section class="slide slide-title">
    <div class="glow-orb glow-purple" style="top: -10%; right: -5%;"></div>
    <div class="glow-orb glow-lime" style="bottom: 10%; left: -3%;"></div>
    <div class="content-wrap">
        <p class="psyke-logo reveal">PSYKE</p>
        <h1 class="reveal reveal-delay-1"><span class="accent">[Client Name]</span></h1>
        <p class="subtitle reveal reveal-delay-2">SEO & GEO Audit — [Month Year]</p>
        <p class="label-muted reveal reveal-delay-3">[client-url.com.au]</p>
    </div>
</section>

Dual score slide:

<section class="slide">
    <div class="slide-split">
        <div class="split-left">
            <div class="dual-score reveal">
                <div class="score-block">
                    <div class="score-ring" style="--score-pct: 0.XX;">
                        <svg viewBox="0 0 100 100">
                            <circle class="ring-bg" cx="50" cy="50" r="45"/>
                            <circle class="ring-fill" cx="50" cy="50" r="45"/>
                        </svg>
                        <div class="score-number">XX</div>
                    </div>
                    <p class="score-label-big" style="color: var(--psyke-purple);">SEO Health</p>
                </div>
                <div class="score-block">
                    <div class="score-ring" style="--score-pct: 0.XX;">
                        <svg viewBox="0 0 100 100">
                            <circle class="ring-bg" cx="50" cy="50" r="45"/>
                            <circle class="ring-fill ring-fill-lime" cx="50" cy="50" r="45"/>
                        </svg>
                        <div class="score-number">XX</div>
                    </div>
                    <p class="score-label-big" style="color: var(--psyke-lime);">GEO Ready</p>
                </div>
            </div>
        </div>
        <div class="split-right">
            <!-- Breakdown grid -->
        </div>
    </div>
</section>

Competitor benchmark:

<div class="competitor-grid">
    <div class="competitor-row header">
        <div class="competitor-cell"></div>
        <div class="competitor-cell">DR</div>
        <div class="competitor-cell">Keywords</div>
        <div class="competitor-cell">Traffic</div>
        <div class="competitor-cell">AI Citations</div>
    </div>
    <div class="competitor-row client">
        <div class="competitor-cell">[Client]</div>
        <div class="competitor-cell">XX</div>
        <!-- etc -->
    </div>
    <!-- competitor rows -->
</div>

Phase 4: Deploy

git add -A
git commit -m "[Client] SEO & GEO Audit - SEO: XX/100, GEO: XX/100"
gh repo create beebeebot/[client]-seo-audit --public --source=. --push
npx vercel --yes --prod

Phase 5: Deliver

Send the Vercel URL to the requester with:

  • Both scores and breakdown summary
  • The presentation link
  • 2-3 sentence summary of key findings

Writing Style

  • Direct and specific. No filler.
  • Evidence before opinion. Show the data, then make the observation.
  • One sharp insight per issue, not three paragraphs restating the same point.
  • Recommendations must be specific: "Add FAQ schema to /services/ page" not "consider adding structured data".

AI Writing Patterns to Avoid (mandatory)

These are the most common tells. Fix every instance before deploying:

  • Em dashes (—): Replace with periods, commas, or restructure. Use sparingly if at all.
  • AI vocabulary: Don't use "crucial", "landscape", "delve", "enhance", "foster", "showcase", "underscore", "pivotal", "vibrant", "testament", "garner", "interplay", "tapestry". Use plain words.
  • Rule of three: Don't force ideas into groups of three. "Buying guides, how-tos, and comparison content" → "buying guides and comparisons".
  • Negative parallelisms: Don't write "It's not just X, it's Y". Just say what it is.
  • Promotional language: No "breathtaking", "groundbreaking", "stunning", "nestled", "in the heart of".
  • -ing superficial analysis: Don't tack on "ensuring...", "highlighting...", "showcasing..." to add fake depth.
  • Vague attributions: No "experts believe", "industry reports suggest". Cite specifics or don't claim it.
  • Filler phrases: No "it's important to note that", "in order to", "at the end of the day".
  • Sycophantic tone: No "Great question!", "Excellent point!", "That's a really good observation".
  • Generic positive conclusions: No "the future looks bright" or "exciting times ahead".

What NOT to Do

  • Don't improvise the slide order — follow the structure
  • Don't use light-mode slides — everything is dark Psyke theme
  • Don't skip the GEO assessment, even without Ahrefs — the AI query testing and citability audit always apply
  • Don't round scores for optics — 43 is 43
  • Don't write generic recommendations — every fix should reference a specific URL or element
  • Don't include the Psyke logo on every slide — title and closing only

Comments

Loading comments...