Pull Request Reviewer

Use when the user wants a local review of a GitHub pull request based on its diff, risks, quality, performance, tests, and security implications.

Use this skill for code review of an existing GitHub PR.

Workflow

1. Resolve the target PR number or list open PRs if needed.
2. Read PR metadata and full diff.
3. Review correctness, conventions, performance, test coverage, and security-sensitive changes.
4. Prioritize concrete findings over generic praise.
5. Return a structured review with suggested follow-up.

Guardrails

• Base the review on the actual diff, not assumptions.
• Findings first, summary second.
• Keep comments actionable and specific.

Example Requests

• Review PR #123 for correctness and risk.
• List the biggest problems in this open PR.

Inputs

• PR number or selection
• GitHub diff
• Repo conventions

Outputs

• Ordered review findings
• Risk summary
• Improvement suggestions

Success Criteria

• The review is grounded in the actual diff.
• Findings are actionable.
• Risky changes are prioritized.

Non-Goals

• Generic praise-only review
• Reviewing without reading the diff

Source Provenance

Derived from src/commands/review.ts.