Multi-Dimensional Novel Evaluation System

Prompts

Multi-dimensional novel evaluation based on provided content, assessing across plot, characters, writing quality, worldbuilding, pacing, originality, emotional resonance, dialogue quality, structure, and reader appeal, producing a total score. Use for book reviews, work evaluation, creative feedback, web novel assessment, and similar scenarios.

Install

openclaw skills install novel-reviewer

Multi-Dimensional Novel Evaluation System

How to Use

Provide novel content (chapter/excerpt/full submission), evaluate as follows:

  1. Input: Title, author, genre (optional); body content
  2. Score by dimension: 10 dimensions, each 1-10 points
  3. Comprehensive review: Total score + strengths/weaknesses analysis + improvement suggestions

Ten Evaluation Dimensions

DimensionWeightScoring Summary
Plot Logic15%Complete causal chain, reasonable conflict, foreshadowed reversals, no dumbing-down
Character Development15%Distinct personality, clear motivation, growth arc, dialogue matches profile
Writing Quality12%Language fluency, description precision, rhythm control, style consistency
Worldbuilding10%Self-consistent rules, unique originality, reasonable reveal rhythm
Pacing12%H/W/P/T ratio, information density, fatigue level, climax distribution
Originality8%Setting uniqueness, anti-trope plot, narrative approach novelty
Emotional Resonance10%Reader immersion, emotional tension, empathy trigger design
Dialogue Quality8%Dialogue naturalness, subtext, personalization, information delivery efficiency
Structure5%Volume/chapter clarity, foreshadowing resolution rate, multi-plot coordination
Reader Appeal5%Opening hook strength, cliffhanger effectiveness, sustained reading desire

Weights total 100%. Each dimension scored 1-10, weighted to produce total score (out of 10).

Scoring Tiers

ScoreTierDescription
9.0-10⭐ MasterpieceNearly flawless across all aspects, industry benchmark
8.0-8.9🌟 ExcellentOutstanding work with clear highlights
7.0-7.9👍 GoodQuality online, pleasant reader experience
6.0-6.9🆗 ReadableAbove passing, room for improvement
5.0-5.9⚠️ WeakMultiple issues, needs targeted improvement
<5.0❌ Rewrite NeededFundamental problems exist

Evaluation Output Format

═══════════════════════════════════════
【Novel Evaluation Report】

Title:
Author:
Genre:
Evaluation scope: Chapter X - Chapter Y

I. Dimension Scores
1. Plot Logic: [X/10]  weighted: X.X
   Comments: ...

2. Character Development: [X/10]  weighted: X.X
   Comments: ...

... (10 items total)

II. Total Score
  Total = Σ(dimension score × weight) = X.X / 10
  Tier: XXX

III. Overall Assessment
- Greatest strengths:
- Key weaknesses:
- Comparison with similar works:
- Target reader match:

IV. Improvement Suggestions
- Priority (high ROI):
- Optional:
- Not recommended to change (signature elements):
═══════════════════════════════════════

See references/dimensions.md for detailed per-dimension scoring guidelines.