Install
openclaw skills install maus-html-summaryTurn articles, transcripts, and raw text into a self-contained illustrated HTML explainer with simple language, memorable structure, and a "Sendung mit der M...
openclaw skills install maus-html-summaryTurn a source text (article, transcript, talk, long post, raw text) into one self-contained HTML page that explains it with the clarity of a children's science show for adults: friendly, concrete, visual, source-faithful, and easy to remember.
The name references "Die Sendung mit der Maus", a German educational TV show known for explaining complex topics in simple visual steps. Outputs should be internationally understandable; do not assume the reader knows the show.
A single self-contained HTML page that is:
The tone is "clear science explainer for adults": friendly, concrete, slightly playful, never childish, never vague.
These seven stages run in order, every time. Skipping a stage produces shallow or hallucinated output. Reproducibility is the audit (Stage 7) catching what earlier stages missed.
Read the source. Build a short internal notes block. It never appears in the HTML; it is the only material allowed in the HTML.
Capture four buckets:
Anti-hallucination rule: if a claim is not in this list, it cannot appear in the HTML.
Count source words. Pick main-idea count by size:
For transcripts: first mentally filter filler words, false starts, hesitations, repetition. Extract from the cleaned signal, not the raw text.
For each main idea, plan 2-4 sub-points. Sub-points are where concreteness lives.
Identify the one-sentence core message; this becomes the hero.
Every main idea carries exactly one explanatory SVG. Pick from this catalog:
Use the skeleton SVGs in svg-patterns.md as the geometric base. Adapt labels, colors, element count to the specific content. Never copy-paste verbatim.
If none of the metaphors fit a given idea, the idea is probably too abstract to stand alone. Fold it into another idea.
Decorative emoji or icons are not SVG metaphors. A row of generic symbols does not satisfy the SVG requirement.
Build the HTML around this arc:
Every sub-point must contain at least one of:
If a sub-point has none of these, it is too vague. Rewrite it using material from the Stage 1 extraction notes, or remove it.
Vague-by-default phrases that signal a failed sub-point:
If you catch yourself writing any of these, you're describing the existence of a thing instead of explaining it. Go back to the extraction notes and pull a fact, name, example, or step.
Write one complete, self-contained HTML document:
<style><link> tagsBefore delivering, walk this checklist mentally. Any failed item must be fixed before emitting.
[ ] Every sub-point contains a number, proper noun, concrete example,
or mechanism step (Stage 5 rule)
[ ] Every main idea has exactly one explanatory SVG drawn from the
catalog, adapted from svg-patterns.md; not a decorative icon
[ ] The "What we left out" box names at least 2 specific things from the
source that were left out, each with a one-line reason
[ ] No fact in the output is missing from the Stage 1 extraction notes
(no hallucinations)
[ ] The memory hook reads aloud in under 5 seconds
[ ] The "If you only remember 3 things" box has exactly 3 items
[ ] HTML is self-contained: no <script>, no <link rel="stylesheet">,
no <img src="http...">, no external font URLs
The audit is the difference between consistent and inconsistent output. Don't skip it. Don't treat it as a wish list. It is a checklist.
If the source is genuinely ambiguous about a point, say so in the output inside the relevant card or in the "What we left out" box. Never invent details to fill space.