类案检索验证

v1.0.0

用真实案例验证法条分析结果,分析司法实践中的裁判分歧、高频败诉原因和法官审查重点。AI生成的分析必须用真实案例验证。当用户想检验法条分析是否符合司法实践时使用。

0· 128·0 current·0 all-time
MIT-0
Download zip
LicenseMIT-0 · Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
Security Scan
VirusTotalVirusTotal
Pending
View report →
OpenClawOpenClaw
Benign
high confidence
Purpose & Capability
Name and description match the instructions: the skill's goal is to validate statutory analysis against real cases and the SKILL.md focuses on how to perform that validation. The skill does not request unrelated binaries, environment variables, or config paths.
Instruction Scope
Instructions direct the agent to verify any AI-generated case information against three external Chinese legal databases (中国裁判文书网, 北大法宝, 法信). This is appropriate for the stated purpose, but the SKILL.md does not provide methods, APIs, or credentials for accessing subscription resources — so the agent may need human-supplied access or could hallucinate citations if it cannot actually query those databases. The guidance to always cross-check is a positive safety measure.
Install Mechanism
No install spec and no code files are present; nothing will be downloaded or written to disk. This is the lowest-risk model for installation behavior.
Credentials
The skill requires no environment variables, credentials, or config paths, which is proportional to an instruction-only validation helper. Note: real verification against paid databases may require credentials or a user-provided document corpus—those are not requested by the skill.
Persistence & Privilege
always is false and the skill is user-invocable. It does not request persistent presence or elevated privileges and does not attempt to modify other skills or system settings.
Assessment
This skill is coherent and low-risk as delivered, but keep these practical points in mind before relying on it: (1) The SKILL.md instructs the agent to verify cases in specific external databases — the agent needs real access to those sites (some are paid/subscription services). If the agent cannot access them, it may invent or misattribute cases; always ask for the primary sources or provide verified documents yourself. (2) This tool is explicitly a verification aid, not a substitute for full legal research or professional advice—verify citations and case numbers in the official databases before relying on them. (3) If you will supply confidential case documents to the agent for verification, confirm you are comfortable sharing that data. (4) If you want the agent to perform live database queries, expect to need credentials or a connected data source; do not give permanent secrets unless you understand the access implications.

Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.

casevk979fw1b1rj7cs590sk0saxt3n83hmexlatestvk979fw1b1rj7cs590sk0saxt3n83hmexlawvk979fw1b1rj7cs590sk0saxt3n83hmexlegalvk979fw1b1rj7cs590sk0saxt3n83hmexmctmilkvk979fw1b1rj7cs590sk0saxt3n83hmex

License

MIT-0
Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.

Comments