EO Workflow: Paper

学术论文工作流 - 从文献研究到论文发表的完整流程，覆盖论文撰写、格式规范、查重控制

Security Scan

The skill promises extensive capabilities (141-expert calls, real literature screening, plagiarism control) but is an instruction-only bundle with no integrations, no credentials, and referenced templates/files absent — the claimed features are not supported by the provided artifacts.

Purpose & Capability

The description promises end-to-end capabilities (real literature screening, 141-expert pool, automated plagiarism control <10%, memory of supervisor preferences). The package has no install, no code, no required credentials or APIs, and no mechanism for accessing external literature/plagiarism services. It also references templates (templates/paper-template.md, templates/ieee-format.md) that are not present. These claims are disproportionate to what is actually supplied.

Instruction Scope

SKILL.md is high-level and prescriptive but contains no concrete runtime steps to perform literature retrieval or plagiarism checking. It suggests calling other EO abilities (eo-ability-*, eo-ability-rag) and an invocation '/dream', but there are no explicit instructions on how those integrations are authorized or executed. The instructions do not request or document any data-handling or external endpoints — meaning the described behaviors are underspecified and likely rely on external plugins not enforced here.

Install Mechanism

No install spec and no code files are present, which minimizes direct disk/network risk. However, the skill references templates that are not included; if those are expected, their absence is an inconsistency to clarify.

Credentials

The skill requests no environment variables or credentials while claiming features (real literature access, plagiarism checking, persistent memory across sessions) that typically require API keys, accounts, or plugin access. The absence of declared credentials is inconsistent with the claimed integrations and is a red flag for unsupported or hidden dependencies.

Persistence & Privilege

always is false and no special persistence or system-wide config writes are declared. The skill does not request elevated platform privileges in its manifest.

What to consider before installing

This skill reads like a marketing description rather than an actionable integration. Before installing or using it, ask the publisher to clarify: (1) exactly how 'real literature screening' and 'plagiarism control' are implemented — which services/APIs are called and what credentials are needed; (2) where the referenced templates live (they are not included); (3) which eo-ability plugins are required and whether those plugins have access to external services; (4) what data (draft manuscripts, author metadata) will be sent to third-party services and how privacy is preserved. If you need real plagiarism checks or automated literature retrieval, prefer skills that declare the exact APIs/credentials and include or link to the integration code. If the publisher cannot provide concrete integration details, treat the claims skeptically and avoid sending unpublished manuscripts to the skill until clarified.

学术论文工作流 - 从文献研究到论文发表的完整流程

一句话介绍

端到端学术论文工作流，将论文研究周期从3周压缩到1周，调用141位专家库实现800%效率提升。

核心功能

• 文献研究: 核心文献智能筛选（50篇→15篇），研究热点报告生成
• 方法论设计: 研究问题定义、实验方案设计、假设推导
• 论文撰写: IMRAD结构完整输出，Abstract/Introduction/Method/Experiment/Conclusion
• 审查修改: 逻辑审查、语言润色、查重控制（<10%）

使用方法

# 启动学术论文工作流
/dream "深度学习医疗影像诊断论文，SCI二区"

// 或者直接调用
使用 eo-workflow-paper 完成一篇关于[主题]的学术论文

与EO插件的协同

Ability	用途
eo-ability-plan	生成 WBS 论文撰写计划
eo-ability-architect	论文整体架构设计
eo-ability-verify	Checkpoint 格式合规检查
eo-ability-memory	记住导师偏好、目标期刊格式
eo-ability-rag	共享学术写作知识库

独立运行模式（有EO vs 无EO）

模式	能力
有EO插件	141专家库调用、跨会话记忆、Checkpoint自动验证、真实文献筛选
无插件（基础）	LLM生成文本、IMRAD结构模板、基础格式检查

案例数据

• 文献综述: 3天→3小时（效率提升800%）
• 修改轮次: 5轮→2轮（节省2周）
• 格式一致性: 100%

示例

/dream "深度学习医疗影像诊断论文，SCI二区，目标期刊Medical Image Analysis"

// EO 自动执行：
// 1. [academic-research-methodologist] → 确定研究热点 + 制定搜索策略
// 2. [specialized-ml-engineer] → 筛选核心文献（50篇→15篇）
// 3. [academic-methodologist] → 设计 U-Net+Attention 模型
// 4. [academic-technical-writer] → IMRAD 结构撰写
// 5. [Proactive Memory] → 记住用户偏好（IEEE格式、目标期刊）

Phases

Phase	负责人	输出
1. 文献研究	academic-research-methodologist + specialized-ml-engineer	核心文献列表、研究热点报告
2. 方法论设计	academic-methodologist	研究问题、方法论、实验方案
3. 论文撰写	academic-technical-writer	完整IMRAD论文
4. 审查修改	code-reviewer	逻辑审查报告、最终稿件

Expert Team

专家	角色	职责
academic-research-methodologist	文献搜索	制定搜索策略、筛选核心文献
specialized-ml-engineer	ML专家	筛选技术文献、验证方法可行性
academic-methodologist	方法论专家	设计研究方法、实验方案
academic-technical-writer	学术写作	IMRAD结构撰写、格式规范
code-reviewer	审查专家	逻辑审查、查重控制

Templates

• templates/paper-template.md - 论文结构模板
• templates/ieee-format.md - IEEE格式规范

---

🦞⚙️ 钢铁龙虾军团 - 让学术研究更高效