Dispute Resolver

v1.0.0

Generate professional, evidence-grounded responses to refund requests and customer disputes that protect the seller while keeping the buyer relationship intact.

0· 121·0 current·0 all-time
byLeroyCreates@leooooooow

Install

OpenClaw Prompt Flow

Install with OpenClaw

Best for remote or guided setup. Copy the exact prompt, then paste it into OpenClaw for leooooooow/dispute-resolver.

Previewing Install & Setup.
Prompt PreviewInstall & Setup
Install the skill "Dispute Resolver" (leooooooow/dispute-resolver) from ClawHub.
Skill page: https://clawhub.ai/leooooooow/dispute-resolver
Keep the work scoped to this skill only.
After install, inspect the skill metadata and help me finish setup.
Use only the metadata you can verify from ClawHub; do not invent missing requirements.
Ask before making any broader environment changes.

Command Line

CLI Commands

Use the direct CLI path if you want to install manually and keep every step visible.

OpenClaw CLI

Bare skill slug

openclaw skills install dispute-resolver

ClawHub CLI

Package manager switcher

npx clawhub@latest install dispute-resolver
Security Scan
VirusTotalVirusTotal
Benign
View report →
OpenClawOpenClaw
Benign
high confidence
Purpose & Capability
The name, description, and required inputs (dispute summary, evidence, preferred resolution) align with the behavior described in SKILL.md. It targets ecommerce dispute responses and does not request unrelated capabilities (cloud credentials, platform access, or system files).
Instruction Scope
SKILL.md confines the agent to generating written response documents based on user-provided context and evidence. It explicitly states it does NOT submit to platform portals or access live systems. It does not instruct reading of local files, environment variables, or transmission to third parties.
Install Mechanism
No install spec or code files are present (instruction-only), so nothing will be written to disk or downloaded during install. This minimizes supply-chain risk.
Credentials
The skill declares no required environment variables, credentials, or config paths. That is proportionate for a text-generation helper that formats user-supplied evidence and references platform policies.
Persistence & Privilege
always:false (default) and autonomous invocation allowed (disable-model-invocation:false). Autonomous invocation is the platform default; combined with this skill's lack of extra privileges or credentials, the persistence/privilege level is appropriate.
Scan Findings in Context
[no_scan_findings] expected: The static scanner had no code files to analyze; this is expected because the skill is instruction-only (SKILL.md only). Absence of findings is not evidence of safety but is consistent with an instruction-only skill.
Assessment
This skill appears coherent and low-risk because it only generates text and asks you to paste evidence. Before installing or using it: 1) Don't paste unnecessary personal or sensitive data (full customer PII, payment details, or government IDs) into prompts — only include the evidence needed for the response. 2) Treat generated outputs as drafts: verify factual accuracy, platform policy citations, and legal implications (this is not legal advice). 3) If you need automatic submission to marketplaces or integration with case portals, do not rely on this skill — it explicitly says it will not submit on your behalf. 4) If your workflow requires storing dispute history or automating submissions, prefer a skill that explicitly declares required credentials and install steps and review those carefully. Overall, the skill is internally consistent but standard operational caution about handling customer data and verifying legal/policy statements still applies.

Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.

latestvk97fdj02qx1dnabjzf673c299d83s9jy
121downloads
0stars
1versions
Updated 1mo ago
v1.0.0
MIT-0

Dispute Resolver

Refund disputes and escalated complaints are one of the highest-stakes interactions an ecommerce seller faces — handle them poorly and you risk negative reviews, platform penalties, or lost customers; handle them well and you can convert a frustrated buyer into a loyal one. This skill generates professional, structured responses to customer disputes that are grounded in the evidence you provide, compliant with platform policies, and calibrated to de-escalate tension while protecting your legitimate business interests.

Use when

  • A buyer on TikTok Shop opens a refund dispute claiming the product arrived damaged, but your tracking data shows it was delivered successfully and the customer has already used the item, and you need a professional response that presents your evidence without sounding defensive or dismissive.
  • A Shopee customer is threatening to leave a one-star review unless they receive a full refund for a product they received correctly but claim does not match the listing description, and you need to draft a response that addresses the claim point-by-point while proposing a reasonable resolution that avoids escalation.
  • You received a platform-mediated dispute notification from Amazon and need to write a formal seller response that follows Amazon's case submission format, references the relevant policy, and presents your fulfillment evidence clearly to the dispute review team.
  • A wholesale buyer is withholding payment claiming a quality issue with a batch delivery, and you need a structured written response that acknowledges the concern, presents your QC documentation, and proposes a partial credit resolution without admitting liability.

What this skill does

This skill takes the dispute context you describe — including the customer's claim, your evidence, platform policies in play, and your preferred resolution — and generates a polished, structured response document. The response is calibrated for the appropriate formality level (platform dispute portal, direct message, or written letter), organized to present your evidence logically, acknowledge the customer's experience without conceding fault, and propose a clear resolution path. Where applicable, the skill flags which platform policy clauses support your position and which aspects of the claim would be difficult to contest.

Inputs required

  • Dispute summary (required): Describe what the customer claims, when they made the claim, what they are requesting, and the platform or channel where the dispute was filed (e.g., TikTok Shop dispute center, Amazon A-to-z claim, direct email).
  • Evidence available (required): List the evidence you have — delivery tracking records, order photos, QC reports, chat logs, product description screenshots, or any other documentation. The quality of your evidence directly determines how strong a response the skill can generate.
  • Preferred resolution (optional): State what outcome you are willing to offer — full refund, partial refund, replacement, store credit, or no concession. If omitted, the skill will recommend the resolution most likely to close the dispute while protecting your seller metrics.

Output format

The output is a Dispute Response Document structured in four parts. Part one is an Opening Acknowledgment that validates the customer experience without admitting fault, written in de-escalating language. Part two is an Evidence Summary presenting your factual record in chronological or logical order with clear reference labels for each piece of evidence. Part three is a Policy Reference block citing the relevant platform or contractual terms that support your position. Part four is a Resolution Proposal offering a specific, time-bound next step with clear acceptance instructions. For platform-specific submissions, the output is also formatted to fit character limits and required field structures.

Scope

  • Designed for: ecommerce operators, TikTok Shop sellers, brand teams, wholesale account managers
  • Platform context: TikTok Shop, Shopee, Amazon, Shopify, platform-agnostic
  • Language: English

Limitations

  • Does not access live platform dispute portals or submit responses automatically — all responses must be manually copied and submitted by the seller.
  • Responses are not legal advice. For disputes involving injury claims, fraud allegations, or significant financial exposure, consult a qualified lawyer before responding.
  • Response effectiveness depends on the quality and completeness of the evidence provided — the skill cannot fabricate or strengthen evidence that does not exist.

Comments

Loading comments...