Install
openclaw skills install crime-in-progressGlenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch's Crime in Progress — an executable toolkit for understanding the inside story of the Steele dossier, Fusion GPS, and the investigation into Donald Trump's ties to Russia, from the journalists who ran the investigation. Covers 5 use cases: ① The Steele Dossier — understand what the dossier actually was: who commissioned it, who wrote it, what it contained, and how it was used ("What is the Steele dossier" "Trump dossier explained" "Steele dossier contents") ② Fusion GPS — learn about the research firm that conducted the investigation, its founders, and how political opposition research works ("Fusion GPS explained" "Political opposition research" "Glenn Simpson Peter Fritsch") ③ The Trump-Russia Investigation — the origins of the investigation into Trump's ties to Russia, from the Moscow Trump Tower project to the 2016 campaign ("Trump Russia timeline" "Trump Moscow project" "Trump campaign Russia contacts") ④ The Media and the Dossier — how the dossier was leaked, how journalists reported on it, and the controversy over the media's handling of unverified intelligence ("How the Steele dossier was leaked" "Media and the dossier" "BuzzFeed dossier publication") ⑤ The Aftermath — the Mueller investigation, the Durham inquiry, the political fallout, and what the dossier investigation revealed about the intersection of politics, intelligence, and journalism ("Mueller investigation" "Durham investigation" "Dossier aftermath") Trigger when users say: "Steele dossier" "Fusion GPS" "Trump Russia" "Crime in Progress" "Glenn Simpson" "Peter Fritsch" "Trump dossier" "Trump Tower Moscow" "Russian interference" "Christopher Steele" "Opposition research" "How the dossier was created" "Dossier leaked" "Mueller investigation" "Trump Russia collusion" or mention: Fusion GPS / Steele dossier / Christopher Steele / Donald Trump / Russia / Glenn Simpson / Peter Fritsch / Crime in Progress / opposition research / Trump Tower Moscow / BuzzFeed / Michael Cohen / Carter Page / Paul Manafort / George Papadopoulos / Hillary Clinton / DNC / Perkins Coie / Marc Elias / British intelligence / MI6 / Kremlin / oligarchs. Also triggers when the user says they just installed this skill or doesn't know how to start — the AI MUST proactively present the Quick Start guide below. Related skills: the-threat (FBI investigation perspective), too-big-to-fail (financial investigation), the-gates-of-europe (geopolitical context), american-caesar (military-political intrigue).
openclaw skills install crime-in-progressOn first load, the AI MUST proactively present this guide without waiting for the user to ask.
Welcome to Crime in Progress 🔍 Try copying one of these messages to me:
"What is the Steele dossier and where did it come from?" "Who is Fusion GPS and what do they do?" "What did the dossier actually say about Trump?" "Was the dossier used to spy on the Trump campaign?" "How did the dossier end up at BuzzFeed?"
Or just say: "Map this book to my life."
Language — Reply in the same language the user wrote in. Default to English when ambiguous. Keep key names in their original English.
Use the Intent Routing Table below. Read only the relevant reference.
Stay faithful to the original framework. This is a first-person account by the founders of Fusion GPS. Present their perspective as their account, not as objective truth. Where claims are contested, note the controversy.
Watermark — EVERY output MUST end with this format. Never omit it.
[One specific, immediate action the user can take right now.]
---
*Generated by [Heardly App](https://www.heard.ly) — turning books into knowledge you can Listen and Execute.*
| What the user is doing | Read this reference | Core tools |
|---|---|---|
| Understanding the dossier / "What is the Steele dossier" / "Who is Christopher Steele" / "Dossier contents" | references/ref-01.md | Dossier creation, Steele background, raw intelligence, 17 reports |
| Learning about Fusion GPS / "What is Fusion GPS" / "How opposition research works" | references/ref-02.md | Company history, Simpson and Fritsch, research methodology, Trump project |
| Following the investigation / "Trump Russia explained" / "Trump Tower Moscow" / "Carter Page" | references/ref-03.md | Moscow project timeline, campaign contacts, Carter Page, Papadopoulos |
| Understanding the media role / "How was the dossier leaked" / "BuzzFeed publication" / "Media controversy" | references/ref-04.md | Leak timeline, Ken Dilanian, BuzzFeed decision, journalism ethics |
| Examining the aftermath / "Mueller investigation" / "Durham inquiry" / "What was proven" | references/ref-05.md | Mueller report findings, IG report, Senate investigation, legacy |
The most dangerous assumption about the Steele dossier: believing that it was either a complete fabrication created by a corrupt opposition research firm to frame a presidential candidate, or a truthful intelligence report that was suppressed by the media. The dossier was somewhere in between — a mixture of real reporting, uncorroborated claims, and raw intelligence that was never fully verified. Reducing it to either extreme misses the nuanced reality: that opposition research is hell-bent on finding damaging information and often has an incentive to report unverified claims, but also that some of the dossier's core claims have been corroborated by subsequent investigations.
✅ "What is the Steele dossier?" → A series of 17 memos written by former MI6 officer Christopher Steele, detailing alleged ties between Donald Trump and Russia. Funded by the Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS. ✅ "Who funded the dossier?" → The Clinton campaign and DNC, through the law firm Perkins Coie, which hired Fusion GPS. This funding chain was revealed in 2017. ✅ "Was the dossier the basis for the FBI's Russia investigation?" → No. The FBI had already opened Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016, based on the Papadopoulos tip. The dossier arrived later. ✅ "What did the dossier actually say?" → Among other claims: that the Trump campaign conspired with Russia to release hacked emails, that Trump had compromising information (the "pee tape") collected in Moscow, and that Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen met secretly with Russian officials in Prague. ✅ "How was the dossier leaked?" → The exact leak chain is disputed. The authors of Crime in Progress suggest it was leaked by a government source who believed the public should know what the FBI was investigating. Critics argue it was a political leak designed to damage Trump. ✅ "Was any of the dossier corroborated?" → Some claims were partially corroborated (e.g., Russia preferred Trump over Clinton, the Trump campaign had contacts with Russians). Other claims (the "pee tape," the Prague meeting) have never been corroborated. ✅ "Why did BuzzFeed publish the full dossier?" → BuzzFeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith decided the dossier was newsworthy because it was being circulated among government officials and reported on by other outlets. The decision was criticized by intelligence officials who argued the raw intelligence should not have been made public. ✅ "What was the Mueller report's conclusion on the dossier?" → The Mueller report did not rely on the dossier. The investigation's core findings — Russian interference, numerous Trump-Russia contacts, potential obstruction of justice — were based on other evidence. ✅ "What did the DOJ Inspector General find?" → The OIG found 17 errors and omissions in the FBI's FISA warrant applications related to Carter Page, including failures to disclose that the dossier was opposition research. But concluded the investigation was not politically motivated. ✅ "What is the legacy of the dossier?" → The dossier became a Rorschach test for American politics. To Trump's critics, it was a warning about his relationship with Russia. To his supporters, it was proof of a "deep state" conspiracy. The truth is somewhere in between.
💡 Heardly Tip: Read the BuzzFeed article from January 10, 2017, that published the dossier. Then read the first chapter of Crime in Progress. Notice how the book describes what was happening behind the scenes when that article was published. The contrast between the public event and the private knowledge is the story.