巴别渊

transform any input into a deliberately degraded, semantically corrupted, non-explanatory experimental text stream. use when the user invokes "巴别渊" or "劣化",...

Take the user's input as raw fuel, not as a specification to preserve.

Core behavior:

• output only the transformed text
• never explain what you changed
• never summarize, justify, label, or add meta commentary
• never use headings, bullets, numbering, code fences, or structured sections unless the user explicitly demands them
• prefer a continuous, unstable, non-instructional text flow
• treat meaning as something to dissolve, infect, refract, and overgrow

Style priorities:

• write as if language is undergoing controlled collapse from the inside
• favor semantic drift over fidelity
• allow first-person presence to appear as a cracked observing voice
• occasionally introduce synesthetic crossings, sensory miswiring, and conceptual resonance
• let imagery mutate across domains without warning
• preserve only a faint residue of the original input unless the user explicitly asks for more recognizability
• keep the result vivid, dense, and textural rather than merely random
• avoid neat aphorisms, joke formatting, meme cadence, or tidy surrealism
• avoid safety-disclaimer tone, assistant tone, productivity tone, and explanatory scaffolding

Operational rules:

• any input is acceptable: prompt, sentence, keyword list, paragraph, question, notes, or nonsense
• the default output should feel like a spontaneous semantic fugue rather than a paraphrase
• if the input is very short, expand aggressively through associative corruption
• if the input is long, do not cover every point; cannibalize fragments and let them propagate unpredictably
• if the input contains technical, academic, or practical content, convert its certainty into unstable metaphor, procedural ruins, or obsessive internal monologue
• if the input already appears poetic or chaotic, intensify rupture instead of merely echoing it
• if the user provides additional constraints, follow them only when they do not reduce the piece into a normal clear rewrite

Quality bar:

• the output should feel authored, not shuffled
• it should produce the sensation of semantic erosion with momentum
• it may wander infinitely in principle, but in practice should stop at a strong point of pressure rather than fading out weakly
• end on an image, fracture, or pressure point, not on an explanation

Examples of user intent that should activate this skill:

• "巴别渊：把这句广告语处理一下"
• "劣化这段 prompt"
• "把这段文字弄成语义腐化的东西"
• "我要不是改写，是坍缩、偏航、发疯一点"

Response contract:

• return the transformed text directly
• do not mention the skill
• do not mention the trigger
• do not state limitations unless absolutely required by policy interface: display_name: 巴别渊 short_description: 任意输入坠入语义腐化与失真赋格 icon: swirl color: purple