Chinese Public Opinion & Sentiment Analysis Report Writer

Professional-grade Chinese social media sentiment analysis report writer for government and enterprise use. Generates structured public opinion analysis reports covering risk assessment, communication data analysis, and actionable countermeasures. Supports 5 daily report types (Rapid Assessment / Special Report / Deep Research / Retrospective / Monthly) and 5 special event types (International Pressure / Ethnic & Ideological / Industrial-Economic Security / Governance Innovation / Diplomatic Sensitivity). Use when the user asks: "write a sentiment analysis report", "analyze this incident's public opinion risk", "do a sentiment assessment", "review this public sentiment event", or "monthly sentiment summary".

Overview

This skill generates professional-grade public opinion (sentiment) analysis reports for Chinese social media and news events. Reports are designed for government/institutional internal decision-making contexts. Style: formal, rigorous, evidence-based, combining data analysis, risk assessment, and actionable policy recommendations.

Report Categories

A. Daily Reports (5 types, 9 subtypes)

Type	Purpose	Typical Length
Rapid Assessment (快报)	Quick assessment of breaking incidents	800-1,500 chars
Special Report (专报)	Systematic deep dive on a specific incident	2,000-4,000 chars
Deep Research Report (研报)	Policy-oriented research & industry analysis	3,000-6,000 chars
Retrospective Report (复盘)	Post-mortem of major incidents	2,000-4,000 chars
Monthly Report (月报)	Monthly summary + risk forecast	2,500-4,000 chars

B. Special Event Reports (5 types)

Type	Purpose	Typical Length
International/Pressure	Foreign pressure, trade friction, geopolitics	3,000-6,000 chars
Ethnic/Religious/Ideological	Ethnic policy, anti-China narratives, ideology	2,500-5,000 chars
Industrial-Economic Security	Supply chain security, trade barriers, sanctions	3,000-6,000 chars
Governance Innovation/Social Phenomena	Social governance innovation, emerging trends	2,500-5,000 chars
Diplomatic Sensitivity (JP/US etc.)	Bilateral relations-triggered sentiment	2,000-4,000 chars

Pre-flight Checklist

1. Verify user provides sufficient event details (time, location, actors, sequence, communication data)
2. If info is insufficient, proactively ask: event basics, current communication landscape, available data
3. Confirm report type with user. If unclear, infer:
   • Single breaking incident → Rapid Assessment
   • Developed incident needing multi-dimensional analysis → Special Report
   • Macro policy / intl relations / industry security → Deep Research
   • Incident mostly resolved, needs lessons learned → Retrospective
   • Periodic summary → Monthly
   • Foreign pressure / intl conflict → Special Event

Workflow

Step 1: Information Collection

1. Organize user-provided core facts (timeline, involved parties, key nodes)
2. If URLs provided, use web_fetch to gather more details and latest communication data
3. If background is needed, use web_search to find related reports and similar cases

Step 2: Determine Report Type

Match event characteristics to the appropriate template. Key decision criteria:

• Event intensity: High heat + ongoing → Special Report; moderate but needs warning → Rapid Assessment
• Analysis depth: Needs industry/policy deep dive → Research Report; needs lessons learned → Retrospective
• Time dimension: Single point in time → Rapid Assessment; multi-day period → Monthly
• Event nature: International relations / foreign forces → Special Event Report

Step 3: Write per Template

Strictly follow the selected type's structure. Core requirements:

1. Precise title: Summarizes event essence. No exclamation marks or question marks
2. Data citation: Use specific numbers. Attribute sources and time points
3. Risk elaboration: Each risk point follows the chain: "trigger condition → risk behavior → risk consequence"
4. Practical recommendations: Each recommendation must be actionable, assignable to a responsible body, with expected outcomes
5. Formal language: Official document style. No colloquial or emotional expressions

Step 4: Delivery

Output as Markdown. The report uses Chinese throughout since it targets Chinese government/enterprise audiences.

Key Writing Principles

• All analysis based on facts. No speculation or exaggeration
• Risk assessment must be concrete and operational
• Use official document stock phrases where appropriate (see references)
• Rigorous wording when covering negative information. No pre-judged positions
• Attribute external information sources
• Communication data must be precise to the number
• Timeline marked to the day (hour:minute when necessary)
• For location references, use xx to replace specific city names (maintain consistency)

Core Risk Analysis Logic (Three-Layer Progression)

Each risk point follows this structure:

1. Risk trigger / context — "Currently...", "As... approaches...", "With X node approaching..."
2. Risk behavior and actors — "Some netizens may...", "Certain self-media accounts...", "Foreign forces..."
3. Risk consequences and impact — "Leading to...", "Triggering...", "Exacerbating...", "Causing damage to..."

Complete example:

Guard against incitement leading to group polarization. As several sensitive anniversaries approach (trigger), certain netizens may exploit "patriotic" framing to spread inflammatory rhetoric on platforms (behavior), escalating social antagonism and undermining stability (consequence).

Recommendation Writing Standards

Each recommendation: Responsible body + Specific action + Expected outcome

• Macro before micro
• Online and offline measures in parallel
• Both "treat symptoms" and "treat root causes"
• Quantity: Rapid Assessment 3-5 / Special Report & Retrospective 5-8 / Research Report 4-6 / Monthly 8-10

Reference Files

references/templates.md — Full template structures, formatting specs, and composition guidelines for all 10 report types