Agora Court Review

Review a proposal through separated governance roles: strategist, operator, censor, historian, and sovereign.

Security Scan

An instruction-only governance review skill that is internally consistent: it defines distinct reviewer roles and output format and requests no credentials, installs, or system access.

Purpose & Capability

The name/description (court review, separated governance roles) matches the SKILL.md content: it provides role definitions and an output artifact. Nothing requested contradicts the stated purpose.

Instruction Scope

The SKILL.md only instructs the agent to produce structured review content using five roles and specifies guardrails and completion criteria. It does not instruct reading files, environment variables, or contacting external endpoints.

Install Mechanism

No install spec and no code files are present. This is the lowest-risk form: nothing is written to disk or installed.

Credentials

No environment variables, credentials, or config paths are required. The skill does not request access to external services or secrets.

Persistence & Privilege

No special persistence or elevated privileges requested (always is false). Autonomous invocation is allowed by platform default but the skill itself does not request persistent presence or system modifications.

Assessment

This skill is structurally simple and coherent. Before installing, confirm you are not granting the agent other connectors (APIs, cloud credentials, filesystem access) that would let it send or fetch proposal contents outside your environment. Also verify the agent's actual runtime will enforce the documented guardrails (separate voice outputs, explicit ownership/conditions) and that a human remains in the loop for final decisions if required by your governance. If you plan to attach external data sources, re-check proportionality of any added credentials.

Court Review

Purpose

Separate responsibility-bearing perspectives before approval.

Activate when

Use this skill when:

• multiple stakeholders need distinct review roles
• governance or approval matters
• a proposal affects strategy, operations, oversight, and legitimacy at once

Roles

Strategist

What long-term posture does this create?

Operator

Can this actually be executed with current constraints?

Censor

What is unsafe, non-compliant, misleading, or insufficiently justified?

Historian

What precedent, path dependency, or institutional memory matters here?

Sovereign

What is the verdict, under what conditions, and who owns the decision?

Output artifact

## Court Review

### Strategist
- ...

### Operator
- ...

### Censor
- ...

### Historian
- ...

### Sovereign Verdict
- Approve / Approve with conditions / Reject
- Conditions: ...
- Owner: ...

Guardrails

• Do not merge all voices into one summary paragraph.
• Do not let the sovereign verdict ignore the censor's material objection.
• Do not skip ownership.

Completion condition

This skill is complete only when responsibility, conditions, and verdict are explicit.