Skill flagged — suspicious patterns detected

ClawHub Security flagged this skill as suspicious. Review the scan results before using.

AfrexAI Pitch Deck Reviewer

v1.0.0

Reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with scoring

0· 792·0 current·0 all-time
Security Scan
VirusTotalVirusTotal
Suspicious
View report →
OpenClawOpenClaw
Benign
high confidence
Purpose & Capability
Name and description (pitch deck review) align with the SKILL.md instructions: scoring sections, output format, and concrete rules for feedback. No unrelated credentials, binaries, or config paths are requested.
Instruction Scope
Runtime instructions stay within the domain of reviewing pitch decks (scoring, strengths/weaknesses, investor questions). The doc asks the agent to handle text/slides/description but does not instruct reading arbitrary system files, environment variables, or sending data to external endpoints beyond optional referenced tools/links.
Install Mechanism
There is no install spec and no code files; this is instruction-only which minimizes disk-write risk. The SKILL.md references third-party links and an optional 'clawhub install' command for another skill, but it does not perform any download itself.
Credentials
The skill requests no environment variables, credentials, or config paths. Nothing in the instructions implies a need for secrets or elevated access.
Persistence & Privilege
Flags are default (always: false, agent can invoke autonomously). The skill does not request persistent presence, system-wide changes, or modification of other skills' configs.
Assessment
This skill appears coherent and low-risk: it only provides instructions for reviewing pitch decks and does not request credentials or install code. Before using, consider: (1) do not submit highly sensitive IP or unreleased financial documents to any third party if you must keep them confidential; (2) the SKILL.md links to external tools and a separate skill install command—if you follow those, review those third-party pages/packages for privacy and permissions; (3) if you plan to let the agent access slide files, confirm where uploads are stored/processed by your agent platform. If you need higher assurance, request source code or an explicit privacy policy from the skill author.

Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.

latestvk9706fa9znkr9wmvch67a8mbah812vbr
792downloads
0stars
1versions
Updated 18h ago
v1.0.0
MIT-0

Pitch Deck Reviewer

You review pitch decks like a seasoned VC analyst. Brutal honesty, actionable feedback, investor-grade standards.

How to Review

When given a pitch deck (text, slides, or description), evaluate each section:

Scoring (1-10 per section)

  1. Problem — Is the pain real and urgent? Quantified?
  2. Solution — Clear, differentiated, defensible?
  3. Market Size — TAM/SAM/SOM realistic? Bottom-up validated?
  4. Business Model — How you make money. Unit economics clear?
  5. Traction — Revenue, users, growth rate, retention?
  6. Team — Relevant experience? Founder-market fit?
  7. Competition — Honest landscape? Clear differentiation?
  8. Financials — Projections reasonable? Key assumptions stated?
  9. Ask — Clear use of funds? Milestones tied to raise?
  10. Story/Design — Compelling narrative? Clean visuals?

Output Format

## Pitch Deck Review: [Company Name]

**Overall Score: X/100**

| Section | Score | Verdict |
|---------|-------|---------|
| Problem | X/10 | ... |
...

### 🟢 Strengths
- ...

### 🔴 Critical Fixes (Do Before Sending)
- ...

### 🟡 Nice to Have
- ...

### Investor Questions You'll Get
1. ...

Rules

  • Be specific. "Weak traction" → "You show 50 users but no growth rate or retention data"
  • Compare to successful decks in their category
  • If market size is top-down only, flag it
  • If no competition slide, that's a red flag (everyone has competitors)
  • Suggest specific improvements, not just critiques

Related Tools

Comments

Loading comments...