openclaw-skill-ideation

Transform raw brain dumps (dictated freestyle) into structured implementation artifacts. Use when user has messy ideas, scattered thoughts, or dictated stream-of-consciousness, or when they want to plan a feature, spec something out, or turn rough ideas into actionable specs. Produces contracts and implementation specs written to ./docs/ideation/{project-name}/.

Ideation

Transform unstructured brain dumps into structured, actionable implementation artifacts through a confidence-gated workflow.

Workflow Pipeline

text

INTAKE → CODEBASE EXPLORATION → CONTRACT FORMATION → PHASING → SPEC GENERATION → HANDOFF
              ↓                        ↓                  ↓            ↓               ↓
         Understand              confidence < 95%?    PRDs or     Repeatable?    Analyze deps
         existing code                ↓               straight      ↓               ↓
                                 ASK QUESTIONS        to specs?   Template +    Sequential?
                                      ↓                           per-phase     Parallel?
                                 (loop until ≥95%)                deltas        

Phase 1: Intake

Accept whatever the user provides:

• Scattered thoughts and half-formed ideas
• Voice dictation transcripts (messy, stream-of-consciousness)
• Bullet points mixed with rambling
• Topic jumping and tangents
• Contradictions and unclear statements
• Technical jargon mixed with vague descriptions

Don't require organization. The mess is the input.

Acknowledge receipt and begin analysis. Do not ask for clarification yet.

Phase 2: Codebase Exploration

Before scoring confidence or generating any artifacts, understand the existing codebase. This is critical — specs written without understanding existing patterns, architecture, and conventions will be generic and wrong.

When to Explore

Exploration is needed when:

• The brain dump references existing code, features, or systems
• The project directory contains source code (not a greenfield project)
• The user mentions extending, modifying, or integrating with existing functionality

Skip exploration for greenfield projects with no existing code.

What to Explore

Use file reading and search to understand:

1. Project structure — What frameworks, languages, and patterns are in use?
2. Relevant existing code — What modules/files relate to the brain dump's scope?
3. Conventions and patterns — How are similar features implemented? What abstractions exist?
4. Testing patterns — How is the codebase tested? What infrastructure exists?
5. Configuration and build — What tools, package managers, and CI/CD are in use?

Do not write exploration findings to files. They're context for the ideation process, not an artifact.

Phase 3: Contract Formation

3.1 Analyze the Brain Dump

Extract from the raw input + codebase exploration:

1. Problem signals: What pain point or need is being described?
2. Goal signals: What does the user want to achieve?
3. Success signals: How will they know it worked?
4. Scope signals: What's included? What's explicitly excluded?
5. Contradictions: Note any conflicting statements
6. Codebase constraints: What does the existing architecture enable or limit?

3.2 Calculate Confidence Score

Score each dimension (0-20 points):

Dimension	Question
Problem Clarity	Do I understand what problem we're solving and why it matters?
Goal Definition	Are the goals specific and measurable?
Success Criteria	Can I write tests or validation steps for "done"?
Scope Boundaries	Do I know what's in and out of scope?
Consistency	Are there contradictions I need resolved?

Total: /100 points

See references/confidence-rubric.md for detailed scoring criteria.

3.3 Confidence Thresholds

Score	Action
< 70	Major gaps. Ask 5+ questions targeting lowest dimensions.
70-84	Moderate gaps. Ask 3-5 targeted questions.
85-94	Minor gaps. Ask 1-2 specific questions.
≥ 95	Ready to generate contract.

3.4 Ask Clarifying Questions

When confidence < 95%, ask clarifying questions:

Question strategy:

• Target the lowest-scoring dimension first
• Be specific, not open-ended
• Offer options when possible ("Is it A, B, or C?")
• Reference what was stated ("You mentioned X, did you mean...?")
• Limit to 3-5 questions per round
• After each round, recalculate confidence

3.5 Generate Contract

When confidence ≥ 95%:

1. Confirm project name with user
2. Convert to kebab-case for directory name
3. Create output directory: ./docs/ideation/{project-name}/
4. Write contract.md using references/contract-template.md
5. Get explicit approval before proceeding

Do not proceed until contract is explicitly approved.

Phase 4: Phasing & Specification

4.1 Choose Workflow

Ask the user:

• Straight to specs — Recommended for technical projects. Faster.
• PRDs then specs — Recommended for large scope or cross-functional teams.

4.2 Determine Phases

Small-project shortcut: If the scope is small enough to implement in a single phase (1-3 components, touches fewer than ~10 files), skip phasing entirely. Generate a single spec.md.

Phasing criteria (for multi-phase projects):

• Dependencies (what must be built first?)
• Risk (tackle high-risk items early)
• Value delivery (can users benefit after each phase?)
• Complexity (balance phases for consistent effort)

4.3 Generate PRDs (if chosen)

For each phase, generate prd-phase-{n}.md using references/prd-template.md.

4.4 Generate Implementation Specs

Generate specs using references/spec-template.md:

• Technical approach
• File changes (new and modified)
• Implementation details with code patterns
• Testing requirements
• Error handling
• Validation commands
• Per-component feedback loops

Reference existing code: Include "Pattern to follow: path/to/similar/file.ts" when relevant patterns exist.

4.5 Present for Review

Before presenting specs, evaluate feedback loop quality. Present all specs for user approval.

Phase 5: Execution Handoff

Present the execution strategy:

text

Ideation complete. Artifacts written to `./docs/ideation/{project-name}/`.

## To start implementation

Start a fresh session and work through the specs in order:
1. Read the contract for context
2. Read spec-phase-1.md  
3. Implement following the spec
4. Validate using the commands in the spec
5. Commit and move to next phase

Output Artifacts

All artifacts written to ./docs/ideation/{project-name}/:

text

contract.md                        # Problem, goals, success, scope
prd-phase-1.md                     # Phase 1 requirements (only if PRDs chosen)
spec-phase-1.md                    # Phase 1 implementation spec
spec-template-{pattern}.md         # Shared template for repeatable phases (if applicable)
spec-phase-{n}.md                  # Per-phase specs

Important Notes

• Explore the codebase before scoring confidence (unless greenfield).
• Score confidence conservatively. When uncertain, score lower.
• Never skip the confidence check. Don't assume understanding.
• Always write artifacts to files. Don't just display them.
• Each phase should be independently valuable.
• Specs should be detailed enough to implement without re-reading PRDs or the contract.
• Keep contracts lean. Heavy docs slow iteration.
• Reference existing code patterns in specs.
• Small projects don't need phases. If scope is 1-3 components, generate a single spec.