Intent-Code Divergence
Medium
- Confidence
- 97% confidence
- Finding
- The decision rule is internally inconsistent: it first says session-only services must be refused, then later says to never override a user's explicit instruction and to do it with a warning. In a payment-triggering skill, that ambiguity can cause an agent to proceed with a call known to fail upstream while still charging the user, creating a direct loss-of-funds risk and undermining safety checks.
