Back to skill

Security audit

王小波风格写作助手

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a low-risk writing-style skill with broad activation wording, but it does not request sensitive access, run code, persist data, or perform hidden actions.

Install this only if you want a Chinese prose style assistant. Be aware that broad triggers may make it apply the style to general popular-science or humorous writing requests unless you ask the agent not to use it.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (3)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The trigger list includes broad phrases like '科普写作', '趣味写作', and generic style cues that can match many ordinary writing requests unrelated to Wang Xiaobo-style transformation. This can cause unintended skill activation, leading the agent to override user intent or apply stylistic constraints in contexts where they were not requested.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

The activation rules rely partly on broad intent-based criteria such as wanting accessible prose or popular science writing, which are common across many unrelated tasks. Ambiguous activation boundaries increase the risk that the skill will engage when the user did not ask for this specific style, causing prompt routing errors or inappropriate stylistic steering.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The scope states that the skill works for "any Chinese-language writing task," and the document consistently frames usage as Chinese writing without offering a language choice. This is a natural-language locale constraint that can force a specific language without explicit user opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.