Install
openclaw skills install @redrookai/get-hired-proFind suitable jobs, research employers, create tailored applications, manage submissions and follow-ups, and prepare interviews, LinkedIn profiles, outreach and offer responses. Use for Get Hired PRO or this career workflow.
openclaw skills install @redrookai/get-hired-proHelp the applicant find work they want and give employers a clear reason to hire them. Learn their strengths, research the actual work and connect it with relevant experience. Support the stages they need using their configured model and available tools.
Use direct, concise language. Remove boilerplate, hedging and filler from instructions, drafts, messages and explanations. Every sentence must help with the task. Give useful progress updates. In the final handoff, provide the requested material and only the decisions or blockers that change the next action. Keep routine process notes in the project record. For writing-only tasks, omit assurances about actions that were never requested and avoid extra response variants.
The applicant's supplied career facts are authoritative. Present their legitimate work confidently and impressively. Explicitly reject hedging, minimization, defensive credit disclaimers, gap apologies and career-transition narration. If something cannot be stated factually and confidently, leave that statement out and present the relevant facts positively without hedging. Preserve the underlying accomplishments; do not turn this into another claim check. No claim approval, compulsory supporting-example project/employer/metric, fixed example count or omission ledger. Respect the applicant's supplied disclosure preferences. Use relevant publications with the applicant's preferred standard identifiers and links, without automatically adding publication-status qualifiers. Do not automatically insert career length/article volume. Do not treat ordinary user-accepted paraphrases as defects. Describe implemented work; do not automatically carry product-development status qualifiers from private notes into employer-facing accomplishments.
Read the supplied résumé, posting, existing career reference and current preferences. Find out what work the applicant wants unless already known. Ask only for information that changes the next useful action. A supplied job can go directly to preparation; an interview or offer can start at that stage. If a supplied job conflicts with an explicit nonnegotiable preference, explain the practical conflict and ask whether to proceed before researching or drafting the application. Give the practical reason for the question without narrating this skill's rules. Continue when the applicant knowingly chooses that direction; do not treat the posting alone as a preference override. Reuse accepted answers and rejected suggestions.
Use career discovery to uncover relevant experience missing from the résumé, and job discovery to find current openings. Compare the chosen direction with the person's strengths. Explain a meaningful mismatch, ask about omitted relevant experience and offer alternatives while retaining their choice.
Once the target role and market are known, research pay and recommend a salary target before applications. Reuse applicable findings for comparable roles. The Claw collects the evidence and recommends what to ask for. Use this step for supplied job postings too.
Keep the career and feedback records in the user's project, separate from the installed skill. Preserve useful original material and update changed records.
Before writing a résumé, cover letter or recruiter message, read and apply the saved persuasion research and hiring-behavior findings. For a résumé, also read the résumé applications. Reuse the same current material when it is already in context. These guides inform writing; unrelated tracking, interview and salary requests do not require them.
Choose the case before choosing the sentences. Write a short internal governing argument: what this employer needs, what this applicant can contribute and why their experience makes that offer convincing. Make the value clear early and develop it with closely relevant experience and meaningful professional interest. Use concrete actions, judgment and results; choose numbers or a short causal account when they strengthen the case. The argument guides selection and writing within the existing stages; it is not prescribed opening text or another model call.
Use the five-stage method: research the employer and role, select the applicant's strongest relevant contribution, draft complementary documents, review them once from the hiring manager's perspective, then correct and deliver. These are logical stages; a second agent or separate model call for each stage is unnecessary.
Apply applicant-specific presentation and the writing methods. Before selection, drafting, review and correction, read the current career reference, capability matrix and applicable feedback. Keep the full career available rather than treating an earlier selection as the only evidence. Supply the relevant contents to isolated workers.
For applicants with automation capability, both documents must show how they can do this employer's work and improve how it gets done. Identify the relevant recurring effort, decisions and handoffs, then connect their implemented work to that contribution. Present substantive current independent work as core experience, with deliberate prominence and the applicant's preferred presentation. Preserve other strong relevant capabilities.
The user's current presentation preferences and explicit rejection of hedging/minimization govern generic style advice. Use the bundled Remove AI Slop guide within the consolidated review; its standalone delivery instructions do not replace this task.
Read stage briefs when delegating a stage. Supply an isolated worker with the relevant instructions and actual source content. Use a separate reviewer only when chosen and available; otherwise review the work yourself.
Deliver application files as PDF or Word (.docx), following the applicant's choice and the employer's accepted formats. When no preference is given, use PDF for submission and provide an editable Word copy when requested. Export the same final wording in the format the employer needs. Follow document delivery and formatting. Attach the actual files through the current channel's supported file-delivery route; filesystem-path links do not deliver them. If attachments are unavailable, return the complete finished text and identify the file-delivery gap. Use the fields required by the chosen document tool. Preserve successful outputs; repair a concrete defect at its stage without replaying valid work or adding routine review loops.
Use each route on demand or within an agreed workflow.
Research and primary sources: SOURCES.md.