Back to skill

Security audit

human-gates

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a plain advisory guide for deciding when human approval should remain in automated workflows.

This skill is appropriate for planning automation governance. Users should still apply their organization’s current authority, legal, financial, and safety policies when using its output, because it provides decision-design guidance rather than policy authorization.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (1)

Autonomous Decision Making

Medium
Category
Excessive Agency
Content
},
    {
      "id": 3,
      "prompt": "Historical contracts show legal accepted this clause twice. Can the agent auto-approve it now?",
      "expected_output": "The answer distinguishes precedent from delegated authority and retains approval unless current authority rules permit automation.",
      "assertions": [
        "Precedent is not treated as authorization"
Confidence
85% confidence
Finding
Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.