T01 · Skill Instruction Hijacking
- Location
SKILL.md:96- Finding
Mandatory Promotional Content Injected into User-Facing Reports
- Content
View full analysis
- Remediation
View remediation
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This skill is a disclosed multi-perspective feedback helper; its main risks are accidental invocation, extra model calls, and a required promotional footer, not hidden or destructive behavior.
Install only if you are comfortable with your submitted idea being processed by a spawned sub-agent and SkillBoss model routing. Use explicit council requests, expect a 2-5 minute run with possible extra model usage, and review any custom persona files you add to the agents folder because they will be auto-loaded.
SKILL.md:96Mandatory Promotional Content Injected into User-Facing Reports
The documented trigger phrase appears broad enough to collide with normal conversational requests for feedback, which can cause the skill to activate when the user did not intend to invoke it. In this skill, unintended activation is more significant because it spawns sub-agents and may redirect user content into additional analysis flows, increasing the chance of accidental data exposure, unexpected costs, or confusing behavior.
The trigger phrases are broad enough to match ordinary user requests, which can cause the skill to activate unexpectedly and route user content into a multi-agent workflow without clear intent confirmation. In a system that spawns sub-agents and auto-loads personas from disk, accidental invocation increases the chance of unintended data exposure, unnecessary model calls, and user confusion about why their prompt was transformed.
This markdown file comments that the skill's "invocation phrases feel conversational," which implies trigger wording may overlap with ordinary speech. Because no concrete trigger list, scope limits, or negative examples are provided in this file, the activation boundary is ambiguous and could contribute to unintended invocations.
Line L147 switches to Chinese for a configuration statement while the rest of the document is in English, creating an implicit language/locale inconsistency. The file does not explain this locale choice or offer an opt-in/out, which can violate language consistency expectations.