Back to skill

Security audit

Methods Section Reviewer

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a local academic Methods-section reviewer with no evidence of network access, persistence, credential handling, or hidden high-impact behavior.

Installers should know that the generated report and suggestions are mainly in Chinese, and the skill should be used only on Methods-section text the user intentionally provides. No evidence suggests it accesses private files, credentials, networks, or persistent agent state.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding
The natural-language description states the skill reviews and revises Methods sections according to a standard, but does so in Chinese only ('基于…进行…审稿与修改建议'). There is no indication that users may choose another language or that the Chinese-only behavior is required for a region-specific purpose, which creates a language/locale policy concern.

Vague Triggers

Low
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding
This manifest is a JSON file, so vague-trigger checks apply. The description only states the skill's general purpose—reviewing Methods sections for writing issues—but does not specify invocation phrases, activation boundaries, or exclusions, making the trigger scope unclear if this description is used for routing or automatic invocation.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.