Natural-Language Policy Violations
- Category
- Not specified by scanner
- Confidence
- 97% confidence
- Finding
L170 明确规定“用简体中文汇报结果”,这是语言/locale 约束。文档中没有提供用户选择语言的选项,也没有说明这是仅面向特定地区或合规场景的必要限制,因此符合自然语言政策中的语言强制问题。
- Content
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This Chinese AutoCLI skill is a disclosed command guide for using supported sites and apps, with consent gates for browser-session debugging, persistent adapter changes, and write actions.
Before installing, understand that this skill encourages using AutoCLI against logged-in browser sessions for some sites. Use it when you are comfortable letting AutoCLI read the requested account-backed pages, and review any prompt carefully before approving write actions or persistent changes under ~/.autocli.
L170 明确规定“用简体中文汇报结果”,这是语言/locale 约束。文档中没有提供用户选择语言的选项,也没有说明这是仅面向特定地区或合规场景的必要限制,因此符合自然语言政策中的语言强制问题。
The file's operational instructions are presented in Chinese, which effectively forces a specific language for users consuming this skill reference. The policy allows locale constraints only when users are given a choice or when the constraint is explicitly documented and justified, neither of which appears here.
Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
${{ item.score > 10 }} ${{ item.active ? 'yes' : 'no' }} ${{ item.title | truncate(30) }} https://api.com/${{ item.id }}.json ${{ item.subtitle || 'N/A' }} ${{ Math.min(args.limit, 50) }}
The document's operative instructions are written in Chinese and do not indicate that the user can choose another language or locale. This creates a natural-language policy concern because it effectively imposes a specific language without opt-in or documented justification.
Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
columns: [rank, title, score]
pipeline:
- fetch: https://api.mysite.com/hot
- select: data.posts
- map:
rank: "${{ index + 1 }}"
This markdown file contains operational instructions only in Chinese, which can amount to a language-policy violation if users or operators are not given an explicit choice of locale. The file does not indicate that the Chinese-only constraint is optional, user-selected, or justified by a region-specific requirement.
Line L03 instructs authors in Chinese to use this file when writing new reference cards, and the rest of the document consistently mandates Chinese-language content patterns. This is a natural-language policy concern because it imposes a specific language without any documented user opt-in or justified locale-specific scope.
This markdown file presents all user-facing instructions and warnings exclusively in Chinese, which can amount to a language-policy violation if users are not given an opt-in or alternative locale. The file does not state that the skill is intentionally region-specific or provide any language choice.
This markdown file presents all usage instructions and notes in Chinese, and there is no indication that the user can choose another language or that the locale is intentionally restricted. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file presents all user-facing guidance in Chinese, including headings and operational instructions, with no indication that the skill is Chinese-only or that users can opt into another language. Under the policy for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a locale-policy issue.
The instructional content and headings are presented in Chinese throughout the file, with no indication that the user can choose another language or that the skill is intended only for a Chinese-speaking context. This creates a natural-language locale constraint that is not opt-in and is not explicitly justified in the document.
The document is written primarily in Chinese and presents usage guidance from a Chinese-language default perspective, including advice to switch to English only if Chinese results are inadequate. This can be interpreted as a locale preference without explicit user opt-in or a stated regional justification.
No suspicious patterns detected.