Back to skill

Security audit

Marketplace Guru

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

The skill is a coherent shopping advisor, but it weakens its advertised read-only boundary by allowing high-impact shopping and account actions after confirmation.

Install only if you are comfortable with the skill using marketplace browsing, possibly with a logged-in browser profile. Treat it as Review-worthy until the author makes the read-only boundary unconditional, especially for checkout, cart, login, payment details, account settings, form submissions, and seller messaging.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Insecure Skill Coding PracticesFinds exploitable flaws such as hardcoded secrets or command injection
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Findings (1)

T09 · Insecure Skill Coding Practices

Warning
Location
SKILL.md:263
Finding

Declared Read-Only Boundary Permits High-Impact State-Changing Actions

Content
View full analysis

Vulnerability Details

File Location: SKILL.md:263-267
Vulnerability Type: Contradictory authorization policy and excessive operational scope
Risk Level: Medium

Vulnerable Code

markdown
### 13. Stay read-only

Do not purchase, add to cart, change account settings, log in, save payment details, send messages to sellers, or perform other state-changing actions unless the user explicitly requests and confirms that specific action.

For any state-changing step, summarize what will change, where, risk, rollback if possible, and wait for explicit confirmation.

The same inconsistency also appears in the non-negotiable policy at SKILL.md:25:

markdown
| Read-only | No purchase/cart/login/payment/account actions without explicit confirmation. |

Technical Analysis

The skill is presented as a read-only purchasing advisor, and README.md:5 states that it does not buy products, add items to a cart, or change accounts. However, the active instructions in SKILL.md do not impose an unconditional read-only boundary. Instead, they authorize purchases, cart operations, login, payment-detail storage, account changes, seller messaging, and other state-changing actions after user confirmation.

Confirmation is a useful safeguard for an intentionally transactional agent, but it does not enforce the advertised read-only design. These capabilities are unnecessary for product discovery, price comparison, seller-risk analysis, and recommendation generation. In a visible browser with an authenticated marketplace profile, the policy may therefore allow the agent to exercise account and commerce privileges beyond the skill's stated purpose.

The issue is especially significant for payment-detail storage and account-setting changes. These operations can affect sensitive account state and create consequences that extend beyond the current comparison task. The broad phrase “other state-changing actions” also leav ...[truncated 1728 chars]

Remediation
View remediation

Remediation Suggestions

  1. Replace the conditional restriction with an unconditional read-only policy. Explicitly prohibit purchases, checkout, cart modification, login, payment handling, account changes, seller messaging, and all other state-changing operations.
  2. Remove language stating that confirmation makes these actions permissible. The skill should instead explain that the requested action is outside its scope and provide non-interactive guidance when appropriate.
  3. Align SKILL.md, README.md, design notes, and metadata so they describe the same security boundary.
  4. Restrict browser use to navigation, filtering, and extraction operations. Do not submit forms, click purchase or cart controls, upload data, or change profile state.
  5. Avoid relying on authenticated browser sessions where public product information is sufficient. If authenticated browsing is necessary for regional prices, instruct the agent to avoid exposing or modifying account and payment data.
  6. Add a final compliance check that fails the task before any state-changing browser operation rather than merely requesting confirmation.
  7. If transactional functionality is intentionally required in the future, implement it as a separate, explicitly named skill with narrowly scoped permissions, transaction previews, amount and merchant verification, independent confirmation, and clear rollback or cancellation guidance.

A hardened replacement could state:

markdown
### 13. Stay strictly read-only

Never purchase, check out, add to or modify a cart, log in, save or change payment details, change account settings, send messages, submit forms, or perform any other state-changing action. User confirmation does not override this restriction. If requested, explain that the action is outside this skill's scope and provide read-only guidance.
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (12)

Exfiltration Commands

High
Category
Prompt Injection
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

Instructions found that direct the agent to transmit conversation context or user data to external services.

Content

Scanner excerpt · SKILL.md (reported line 265)May include surrounding context.

md
### 13. Stay read-only

Do not purchase, add to cart, change account settings, log in, save payment details, send messages to sellers, or perform other state-changing actions unless the user explicitly requests and confirms that specific action.

For any state-changing step, summarize what will change, where, risk, rollback if possible, and wait for explicit confirmation.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The activation description is very broad ('buy, compare, choose, or verify a product') and overlaps with common shopping-related requests, which can cause the skill to trigger in situations the user did not intend. Overbroad invocation increases the chance the agent opens marketplace sites or begins purchase-oriented browsing unnecessarily, expanding exposure to external content and downstream state-changing opportunities.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
87% confidence
Finding

The required first question is specified as the Russian phrase "Куда доставка?" and multiple trigger examples are also hard-coded in Russian. The file does not state that language should follow the user's preference or locale, which can violate a language-choice policy.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Ae4

Medium
Category
analysis-evasion
Confidence
80% confidence
Finding

Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script content

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

This markdown file includes a default user-facing prompt in Russian as the prescribed short question, but does not indicate that the skill is region-specific or that users may choose another language. That creates a natural-language policy issue because the skill appears to enforce a specific language by default without opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

The recommended phrasing examples are presented as default interaction text and are exclusively in Russian. Because the file does not frame the skill as explicitly Russian-only or offer language selection, these instructions can cause the skill to respond in a fixed language regardless of user preference.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

This line gives a default prompt for broad-query interactions entirely in Russian and presents it as the standard behavior. Without a corresponding language-choice rule or locale limitation, this conflicts with the policy requirement not to force a specific language without user opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
88% confidence
Finding

The 'Important question' is another prescribed interaction string written only in Russian, reinforcing a fixed-language interaction model. Since the document does not provide opt-in, fallback, or region-scoped justification, this is a policy concern.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
87% confidence
Finding

This example supplies a concrete default response entirely in Russian for a common interaction path. In the absence of any stated user language selection or region-only scope, it indicates a natural-language policy violation by prescribing one language for all users.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

The skill description hard-codes Russian marketplaces as the target scope without signaling this as a user-selected preference or a documented policy constraint. In shopping/comparison workflows, forcing a locale can bias recommendations, omit better or safer options in other regions, and mislead users about availability, pricing, shipping, warranty, or regulatory differences.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
78% confidence
Finding

The file presents mixed-language usage examples, including Russian, but does not clarify whether the skill adapts to the user's preferred language or locale by request. Under the policy rule, forcing or implicitly steering toward a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy concern.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
85% confidence
Finding

The usage guidance assumes Moscow for delivery-speed and availability checks without obtaining user opt-in. This can produce inaccurate comparisons and delivery estimates for users in other cities, causing poor purchasing decisions or hidden shipping/stock differences, though it does not create direct system compromise.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.