ci-cd-and-automation

Automate quality gates so no change reaches production without passing tests, lint, and build

Install

openclaw skills install @paudyyin/ci-cd-and-automation

CI/CD and Automation

Overview

Automate quality gates so that no change reaches production without passing tests, lint, type checking, and build. CI/CD is the enforcement mechanism for every other skill �?it catches what humans and agents miss, and it does so consistently on every single change.

Shift Left: Catch problems as early in the pipeline as possible. A bug caught in linting costs minutes; the same bug caught in production costs hours. Move checks upstream �?static analysis before tests, tests before staging, staging before production.

Faster is Safer: Smaller batches and more frequent releases reduce risk, not increase it. A deployment with 3 changes is easier to debug than one with 30. Frequent releases build confidence in the release process itself.

When to Use

Setting up a new project's CI pipeline
Adding or modifying automated checks
Configuring deployment pipelines
When a change should trigger automated verification
Debugging CI failures

The Quality Gate Pipeline

Every change goes through these gates before merge:

text

Pull Request Opened
    �?    �?┌─────────────────�?�?  LINT CHECK     �? eslint, prettier
�?  �?pass         �?�?  TYPE CHECK     �? tsc --noEmit
�?  �?pass         �?�?  UNIT TESTS     �? jest/vitest
�?  �?pass         �?�?  BUILD          �? npm run build
�?  �?pass         �?�?  INTEGRATION    �? API/DB tests
�?  �?pass         �?�?  E2E (optional) �? Playwright/Cypress
�?  �?pass         �?�?  SECURITY AUDIT �? npm audit
�?  �?pass         �?�?  BUNDLE SIZE    �? bundlesize check
└─────────────────�?    �?    �?  Ready for review

No gate can be skipped. If lint fails, fix lint �?don't disable the rule. If a test fails, fix the code �?don't skip the test.

完成条件

Pipeline 配置完成条件：CI 配置文件已写入（.github/workflows/ci.yml 或等效），包�?Lint �?Type Check �?Unit Test �?Build �?Integration �?Security Audit 全部 gate，PR 触发后自动运行�?- **质量门完成条�?*：所�?gate 均已配置且不可跳过，失败时阻塞合并，通过时自动放行�?- 部署管道完成条件：部署策略已定义（blue-green / rolling / canary），环境变量和密钥通过 CI secrets 管理，回滚机制已配置�?

GitHub Actions Configuration

Basic CI Pipeline

yaml

# .github/workflows/ci.yml
name: CI

on:
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]
  push:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  quality:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: '22'
          cache: 'npm'

      - name: Install dependencies
        run: npm ci

      - name: Lint
        run: npm run lint

      - name: Type check
        run: npx tsc --noEmit

      - name: Test
        run: npm test -- --coverage

      - name: Build
        run: npm run build

      - name: Security audit
        run: npm audit --audit-level=high

With Database Integration Tests

yaml

  integration:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    services:
      postgres:
        image: postgres:16
        env:
          POSTGRES_DB: testdb
          POSTGRES_USER: ci_user
          POSTGRES_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.CI_DB_PASSWORD }}
        ports:
          - 5432:5432
        options: >-
          --health-cmd pg_isready
          --health-interval 10s
          --health-timeout 5s
          --health-retries 5

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: '22'
          cache: 'npm'
      - run: npm ci
      - name: Run migrations
        run: npx prisma migrate deploy
        env:
          DATABASE_URL: postgresql://ci_user:${{ secrets.CI_DB_PASSWORD }}@localhost:5432/testdb
      - name: Integration tests
        run: npm run test:integration
        env:
          DATABASE_URL: postgresql://ci_user:${{ secrets.CI_DB_PASSWORD }}@localhost:5432/testdb

Note: Even for CI-only test databases, use GitHub Secrets for credentials rather than hardcoding values. This builds good habits and prevents accidental reuse of test credentials in other contexts.

E2E Tests

yaml

  e2e:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: '22'
          cache: 'npm'
      - run: npm ci
      - name: Install Playwright
        run: npx playwright install --with-deps chromium
      - name: Build
        run: npm run build
      - name: Run E2E tests
        run: npx playwright test
      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        if: failure()
        with:
          name: playwright-report
          path: playwright-report/

Feeding CI Failures Back to Agents

The power of CI with AI agents is the feedback loop. When CI fails:

text

CI fails
    �?    �?Copy the failure output
    �?    �?Feed it to the agent:
"The CI pipeline failed with this error:
[paste specific error]
Fix the issue and verify locally before pushing again."
    �?    �?Agent fixes �?pushes �?CI runs again

Key patterns:

text

Lint failure �?Agent runs `npm run lint --fix` and commits
Type error  �?Agent reads the error location and fixes the type
Test failure �?Agent follows debugging-and-error-recovery skill
Build error �?Agent checks config and dependencies

Deployment Strategies

Preview Deployments

Every PR gets a preview deployment for manual testing:

yaml

# Deploy preview on PR (Vercel/Netlify/etc.)
deploy-preview:
  runs-on: ubuntu-latest
  if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
  steps:
    - uses: actions/checkout@v4
    - name: Deploy preview
      run: npx vercel --token=${{ secrets.VERCEL_TOKEN }}

Feature Flags

Feature flags decouple deployment from release. Deploy incomplete or risky features behind flags so you can:

Ship code without enabling it. Merge to main early, enable when ready.
Roll back without redeploying. Disable the flag instead of reverting code.
Canary new features. Enable for 1% of users, then 10%, then 100%.
Run A/B tests. Compare behavior with and without the feature.

typescript

// Simple feature flag pattern
if (featureFlags.isEnabled('new-checkout-flow', { userId })) {
  return renderNewCheckout();
}
return renderLegacyCheckout();

Flag lifecycle: Create �?Enable for testing �?Canary �?Full rollout �?Remove the flag and dead code. Flags that live forever become technical debt �?set a cleanup date when you create them.

Staged Rollouts

text

PR merged to main
    �?    �?  Staging deployment (auto)
    �?Manual verification
    �?  Production deployment (manual trigger or auto after staging)
    �?    �?  Monitor for errors (15-minute window)
    �?    ├── Errors detected �?Rollback
    └── Clean �?Done

Rollback Plan

Every deployment should be reversible:

yaml

# Manual rollback workflow
name: Rollback
on:
  workflow_dispatch:
    inputs:
      version:
        description: 'Version to rollback to'
        required: true

jobs:
  rollback:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Rollback deployment
        run: |
          # Deploy the specified previous version
          npx vercel rollback ${{ inputs.version }}

Environment Management

text

.env.example       �?Committed (template for developers)
.env               �?NOT committed (local development)
.env.test          �?Committed (test environment, no real secrets)
CI secrets         �?Stored in GitHub Secrets / vault
Production secrets �?Stored in deployment platform / vault

CI should never have production secrets. Use separate secrets for CI testing.

Automation Beyond CI

Dependabot / Renovate

yaml

# .github/dependabot.yml
version: 2
updates:
  - package-ecosystem: npm
    directory: /
    schedule:
      interval: weekly
    open-pull-requests-limit: 5

Build Cop Role

Designate someone responsible for keeping CI green. When the build breaks, the Build Cop's job is to fix or revert �?not the person whose change caused the break. This prevents broken builds from accumulating while everyone assumes someone else will fix it.

PR Checks

Required reviews: At least 1 approval before merge
Required status checks: CI must pass before merge
Branch protection: No force-pushes to main
Auto-merge: If all checks pass and approved, merge automatically

CI Optimization

When the pipeline exceeds 10 minutes, apply these strategies in order of impact:

text

Slow CI pipeline?
├── Cache dependencies
�?  └── Use actions/cache or setup-node cache option for node_modules
├── Run jobs in parallel
�?  └── Split lint, typecheck, test, build into separate parallel jobs
├── Only run what changed
�?  └── Use path filters to skip unrelated jobs (e.g., skip e2e for docs-only PRs)
├── Use matrix builds
�?  └── Shard test suites across multiple runners
├── Optimize the test suite
�?  └── Remove slow tests from the critical path, run them on a schedule instead
└── Use larger runners
    └── GitHub-hosted larger runners or self-hosted for CPU-heavy builds

Example: caching and parallelism

yaml

jobs:
  lint:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '22', cache: 'npm' }
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm run lint

  typecheck:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '22', cache: 'npm' }
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npx tsc --noEmit

  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '22', cache: 'npm' }
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm test -- --coverage

Common Rationalizations

Rationalization	Reality
"CI is too slow"	Optimize the pipeline (see CI Optimization below), don't skip it. A 5-minute pipeline prevents hours of debugging.
"This change is trivial, skip CI"	Trivial changes break builds. CI is fast for trivial changes anyway.
"The test is flaky, just re-run"	Flaky tests mask real bugs and waste everyone's time. Fix the flakiness.
"We'll add CI later"	Projects without CI accumulate broken states. Set it up on day one.
"Manual testing is enough"	Manual testing doesn't scale and isn't repeatable. Automate what you can.

Red Flags

No CI pipeline in the project
CI failures ignored or silenced
Tests disabled in CI to make the pipeline pass
Production deploys without staging verification
No rollback mechanism
Secrets stored in code or CI config files (not secrets manager)
Long CI times with no optimization effort

Verification

After setting up or modifying CI:

All quality gates are present (lint, types, tests, build, audit)
Pipeline runs on every PR and push to main
Failures block merge (branch protection configured)
CI results feed back into the development loop
Secrets are stored in the secrets manager, not in code
Deployment has a rollback mechanism
Pipeline runs in under 10 minutes for the test suite

Version 1.0.0 - Initial release, sourced from Anthropic official ci-cd-and-automation skill