Skill flagged — suspicious patterns detected
ClawHub Security flagged this skill as suspicious. Review the scan results before using.
Download zip
LicenseMIT-0 · Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
Security Scan
OpenClaw
Suspicious
medium confidencePurpose & Capability
Name, description, and all provided files are consistent: this is an instruction-only paraphrasing/'de-AI' tool. There are no requested binaries, env vars, or installs that don't match the stated purpose.
Instruction Scope
SKILL.md explicitly instructs the agent to 'bypass AI detectors' (GPTZero, Turnitin, Originality.ai) and prescribes aggressive rewriting strategies tailored to specific detectors. While that is consistent with the skill's stated objective, these instructions go beyond neutral paraphrasing: they encourage removal of structural cues, injection of colloquialisms and 'imperfections', and detector-targeted strategies that can facilitate academic dishonesty or other misuse. The workflow does not reference any external endpoints or credential access.
Install Mechanism
Instruction-only skill with no install spec, no downloads, and no code files. This minimizes technical attack surface (no code written to disk, no external packages).
Credentials
The skill requires no environment variables, credentials, or config paths. There is no disproportionate credential ask.
Persistence & Privilege
The skill is not always-enabled and uses default autonomous invocation settings. It does not request system-wide config changes or extra privileges.
What to consider before installing
This skill is coherent with its stated purpose (it is explicitly built to remove AI-writing fingerprints and evade detectors). However, that very purpose creates ethical and practical risks: it can enable academic dishonesty, policy violations, or plagiarism. If you consider installing it, think about the following:
- Legal/ethical: Do you have permission to transform the target text (student work, proprietary content)? Many institutions ban attempts to evade detection. Using Aggressive mode on academic texts can violate rules.
- Output safety: Aggressive rewrites can change nuance or meaning despite the 'preserve meaning' requirement — always manually verify facts, citations, and legal wording.
- Use cases: Prefer Light/Medium for legitimate editing; avoid Aggressive for academic or legal material. Require human review before publishing.
- Data sensitivity: Although the skill has no code and no network endpoints, feeding sensitive or confidential text into any paraphraser risks exposure in logs or downstream systems — only process data you are allowed to transform.
- Operational controls: If you proceed, restrict use to trusted users, mandate review of outputs, and avoid automated bulk processing for high-stakes documents.
In short: technically coherent and low technical risk, but high misuse/ethical risk — proceed only with clear policies and human oversight.Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.
latestvk977chx9kbygz8066hf8g1153184v4ph
License
MIT-0
Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
