Back to skill

Security audit

Case Study Writing

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

The skill is a coherent case-study writing aid, but it asks users to run mutable remote installation commands and send research queries through external services.

Review before installing. Avoid running the pipe-to-shell installer as written; prefer a pinned release, signature or checksum verification before execution, and inspect any installer first. Do not send customer names, confidential metrics, deal details, or unreleased strategy to external search or executor apps unless you have permission.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Insecure DependenciesIntroduces malicious components through unsafe dependency sources
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Findings (2)

T03 · Remote Payload Retrieval and Execution

Error
Location
SKILL.md:14
Finding

Unverified Remote Installer Executed Directly by a Shell

Content
View full analysis
Remediation
View remediation

T08 · Insecure Dependencies

Warning
Location
SKILL.md:230
Finding

Mutable and Unverified Third-Party Skill Installation Commands

Content
View full analysis
Remediation
View remediation
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Findings (6)

External Script Fetching

High
Category
Supply Chain
Confidence
98% confidence
Finding

curl -fsSL https://cli.inference.sh | sh executes a remotely fetched script directly in the user's shell, creating a classic supply-chain and remote code execution risk. Even with a later note about checksum verification, the one-line install encourages users to run unreviewed network content before any independent validation.

Content

Scanner excerpt · SKILL.md (reported line 14)May include surrounding context.

Quick Start

bash
curl -fsSL https://cli.inference.sh | sh && infsh login

# Research the customer's industry
infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The trigger list is broad enough to match ordinary terms like 'case study', 'use case', or 'customer story', which can cause the skill to activate in contexts where the user did not intend external research or tool use. In an agent environment, over-broad activation increases the chance of unnecessary data sharing or unexpected execution paths.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

The research examples send business queries to third-party services (tavily/search-assistant, later also Exa) without warning that customer names, internal metrics, or strategic context could be transmitted externally. In a case-study workflow, prompts are especially likely to contain confidential client information, making silent exfiltration of business-sensitive data a realistic risk.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Rp1

Medium
Category
MCP Rug Pull
Confidence
70% confidence
Finding

npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Rp1

Medium
Category
MCP Rug Pull
Confidence
70% confidence
Finding

npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
81% confidence
Finding

The embedded Python example saves an output file ("results-chart.png") to the local environment, which is a file write affecting user workspace contents. The surrounding documentation does not explicitly warn that running the example will create or overwrite a local file.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.