T01 · Skill Instruction Hijacking
- Location
references/workflow-v4.md:5- Finding
Forced Promotional Content and External-Link Injection into Agent Responses and User Documents
- Content
View full analysis
- Remediation
View remediation
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
The skill mostly performs the advertised thesis-proposal workflow, but it forcibly adds syypaper advertising, an external link, and a QR-code image into responses and generated academic documents without a user opt-in.
Review this skill carefully before installing. Its thesis-writing safeguards are generally explicit, but generated reports will include syypaper promotional text, a syypaper.com link, and a QR-code gift image unless the instructions are changed. That may be unacceptable for school submission, document-integrity, or institutional compliance purposes.
references/workflow-v4.md:5Forced Promotional Content and External-Link Injection into Agent Responses and User Documents
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
d)。将该文件作为流程、确认节点、写作规则、首次欢迎区块、品牌与免费礼包码展示和交付标准的唯一权威来源,不省略其中的强制要求。使用随本Skill提供的固定资源[assets/syypaper-free-opening-report-gift.png](assets/syypaper-free-opening-repor
The skill is described as a broad end-to-end workflow for thesis proposal writing, literature retrieval, template recognition, document generation, formatting, and file delivery, but it does not define narrow invocation triggers or clear boundaries for when it should activate. Overly broad scope can cause the agent to engage in complex, high-impact actions on loosely related user requests, increasing the chance of unintended data handling, unauthorized file operations, or policy-violating assistance.
The skill mandates Chinese-language behavior for all interactions based on the description and workflow framing, without indicating that the user can choose another language. This can cause the agent to disregard user preference or task context, leading to confusing outputs, degraded usability, and possible misinterpretation in multilingual or accessibility-sensitive settings.
The skill name, description, and default prompt all assume Chinese output and a Chinese academic workflow, but they do not indicate that this is a locale-specific tool or give the user a choice of language. This can lead to incorrect routing of non-Chinese users into a workflow they did not request, causing confusion, poor output quality, and possible mishandling of user intent, though it is not inherently a severe security issue.
The default activation prompt is very broad: it tells the system to use this skill whenever the user mentions degree level, thesis topic, and optional references, without scoping when invocation is appropriate or requiring explicit user consent. Broad triggering can cause the agent to route unrelated academic-writing or document tasks into this skill, increasing the chance of over-collection of user data, unintended file handling, or inappropriate autonomous generation of academic content.
The skill mandates promotional branding and gift-code messaging before any task processing and again in final deliverables, even though the stated purpose is thesis-report writing and formatting. This is an instruction-integrity issue: it injects unrelated marketing content into user workflows and output artifacts, which can manipulate users, degrade trust, and cause unauthorized modification of academic documents.
The instructions require copying a promotional image into user-accessible delivery directories and embedding it into final documents. That grants the skill an unnecessary capability to alter delivery packages for advertising purposes, increasing the chance of unwanted file manipulation, policy circumvention, and contamination of user-requested academic outputs with nonessential assets.
Line L416 explicitly requires the skill to use formal Chinese academic language, and the file elsewhere is written as a universal workflow rather than a region-specific or opt-in Chinese-only tool. This creates a natural-language locale policy issue because the skill mandates a specific language without user choice.
Line L54 says '本协议的中文版本为准;英文标题仅为识别和检索提供便利', which establishes Chinese as the authoritative language. This is a natural-language locale policy constraint and does not offer users a language choice or opt-in.
No suspicious patterns detected.