Ae1
- Category
- analysis-evasion
- Confidence
- 100% confidence
- Finding
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- Content
md | `v1.0.3` | `v1.x` | 结构重构:全部内容内联进单一根目录 `SKILL.md`(平台拦截 `assets/`、`references/` 子目录文件) |
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This appears to be a writing-engine helper, but its own version notes say it was repackaged to bypass platform upload/security interception.
Install only if you are comfortable with a skill that edits and debugs a local text-generation project, and review any generated Node.js commands or file writes before running them. The main issue is not the writing engine itself, but the artifact's stated intent to bypass platform upload/security restrictions by inlining code and assets.
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
| `v1.0.3` | `v1.x` | 结构重构:全部内容内联进单一根目录 `SKILL.md`(平台拦截 `assets/`、`references/` 子目录文件) |
The skill description states the engine is for Chinese '孟婆汤风格' copy generation and the rest of the file consistently defines invocation and operation around Chinese labels and phrasing. There is no indication that language choice is optional or that the Chinese-only constraint is a documented, justified regional requirement.
The version notes explicitly describe restructuring content to inline code and assets in markdown in order to bypass platform upload interception and security restrictions. Even if the embedded code here is not overtly malicious, normalizing techniques to evade platform safety controls weakens trust boundaries and can be reused to smuggle harmful payloads past review.
In this markdown file, the tutorial instructs users to write generated samples to tmp/友情候选.md, which is a filesystem write affecting local data. The surrounding section presents this as a normal step but does not include any warning or note that the action creates/modifies local files.
No suspicious patterns detected.