Back to skill

Security audit

TripSeek

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

TripSeek is a non-executable travel-planning reference skill with no hidden commands, persistence, or credential handling; the main caveat is mixed English and Chinese guidance.

Before installing, consider whether Chinese-language reference material is acceptable for your use. The skill appears safe from a security standpoint, but travel document and booking guidance should still be verified against current official sources before making real travel decisions.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (4)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

This markdown file presents all user-facing guidance exclusively in Chinese, which can amount to a language/locale policy violation when no user opt-in or alternative language option is provided. The content does not indicate that the skill is intended only for Chinese-speaking users or a China-specific context.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains all user-facing guidance in Chinese and does not indicate that the user can choose a preferred language or locale. Under the policy criteria, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

This markdown file presents all user-facing guidance in Chinese and does not indicate that users can choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-language audience. Under the language/locale policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

This markdown file presents all guidance exclusively in Chinese, which can amount to a language/locale policy issue when no user opt-in or alternative language option is provided. The content does not state that the skill is region-specific or intentionally limited to Chinese-speaking users.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.