Security audit

HiLegal Boundaryless · Strategic · Results

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a markdown-only compliance reference skill with broad but disclosed business-compliance guidance and no executable code, persistence, or hidden data access.

Install only if you want a broad Chinese/English cross-border compliance reference helper. Use it for preliminary research, not final legal, tax, credit, or pricing decisions; confirm important results with current official sources or a qualified professional.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code

Findings (7)

Vague Triggers

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 92% confidence
Finding: The skill description is broad enough to capture nearly any international-business compliance or legal question, which can cause the agent to invoke this skill outside narrowly intended scenarios. Overbroad routing increases the chance of inappropriate tool use, unnecessary retrieval of sensitive business/legal data, and lower-quality or misleading compliance guidance when a more specific skill or safer fallback should handle the request.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Vague Triggers

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 88% confidence
Finding: The trigger list contains generic phrases such as '合规咨询', '合规问答', 'corporate credit', and 'global pricing' that are ambiguous and likely to overlap with ordinary discussion topics. Such ambiguous triggers can cause accidental activation on loosely related prompts, leading the system to over-collect information, provide quasi-legal advice in the wrong context, or bypass better-matched specialized workflows.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 92% confidence
Finding: The document is written entirely in Chinese, beginning with a Chinese title and continuing throughout, with no indication that users may request another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking or China-specific audience. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language locale violation.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 92% confidence
Finding: This markdown file presents all instructional content in a single language and does not indicate that the user can opt into another language or that the skill is intentionally region- or locale-specific. Under the policy rules, forcing a specific language without user choice is a natural-language policy concern.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 92% confidence
Finding: The file's title and all substantive content are presented exclusively in Chinese, with no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally restricted to a Chinese-speaking or region-specific audience. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 78% confidence
Finding: This markdown file presents its guidance primarily in Chinese, with only an English translation in the title, and does not indicate that users may choose another language or locale. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 94% confidence
Finding: The document is written almost entirely in Chinese and does not indicate that users may choose another language or locale. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale constraint is explicitly documented and justified.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.