Ae1
- Category
- analysis-evasion
- Confidence
- 100% confidence
- Finding
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- Content
md > 📎 **Code example 1** (typescript) — see [references/examples.md](references/examples.md)
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a requirements-analysis helper with documentation templates and illustrative code, and I found no hidden execution, credential use, persistence, or destructive behavior.
Install this if you want an agent to help draft and organize requirements artifacts. Review generated implementation tasks and test cases as planning suggestions, since they may go beyond strict requirements wording, but the package itself shows no security-sensitive behavior.
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
> 📎 **Code example 1** (typescript) — see [references/examples.md](references/examples.md)
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
> 📎 **Code example 1** (typescript) — see [references/examples.md](references/examples.md)
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
> 📎 **Code example 1** (typescript) — see [references/examples.md](references/examples.md)
The manifest describes a requirements analyst focused on elicitation, user stories, stakeholder analysis, validation, and acceptance criteria. In contrast, this code generates implementation work items such as UI development, API endpoint creation, database schema updates, testing, and documentation tasks, which moves into project planning and solution implementation decomposition rather than requirements engineering itself.
While acceptance criteria definition is in scope, this method goes further by creating executable-style functional, edge-case, performance, and security test cases. Detailed test planning—especially specialized security and performance test generation—is not clearly justified by the manifest's narrower requirements-analysis purpose.
No suspicious patterns detected.