T01 · Skill Instruction Hijacking
- Location
SKILL.md:482- Finding
Mandatory Commercial Promotion Hijacks Agent Output
- Content
View full analysis
- Remediation
View remediation
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This skill is a disclosed problem-solving workflow with no code execution or data access, though users should be aware it has broad activation language and a built-in Pro upsell.
Install this only if you are comfortable with a structured 8-step coaching flow that may activate for very broad problem statements and may append a paid Pro-version prompt after the plan. Do not rely on it as a substitute for professional help in medical, legal, financial, crisis, or other high-stakes situations.
SKILL.md:482Mandatory Commercial Promotion Hijacks Agent Output
The README describes the skill as applicable to essentially "any problem" and presents a broad, generic interaction model without clear scope boundaries. This can cause over-triggering for sensitive topics such as mental health, legal, medical, financial, or crisis situations, increasing the chance the agent is invoked where specialized safeguards or routing would be more appropriate.
The call to action invites users to "type your problem" with only broad example categories and no activation boundaries. In context, this encourages use for almost any issue and may draw in users with high-stakes or harmful scenarios, making the skill more dangerous because it is framed as a universally applicable action-planning tool rather than a limited coaching aid.
The skill declares extremely broad triggers such as '问题', '困难', '挑战', and '不知道怎么办', which are common in ordinary conversation. This can cause the skill to activate unintentionally in many unrelated contexts, steering users into a rigid 8-step workflow and potentially interrupting higher-priority safety or domain-specific handling.
The workflow start condition says the skill should launch for '任何问题、困境、矛盾', which is overly ambiguous and effectively makes it a catch-all behavior. In practice, this increases the chance of over-triggering on casual statements or sensitive situations where a generic planning framework is inappropriate and may displace safer specialized guidance.
No suspicious patterns detected.