T09 · Insecure Skill Coding Practices
- Location
SKILL.md:183- Finding
Ed25519 Private Signing Key Exposed Through Standard Output
- Content
View full analysis
- Remediation
View remediation
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This non-executing guide is coherent, but it should be reviewed because its examples handle signing keys and sensitive trading audit data in risky ways.
Install only if you want a GreenHelix-focused trading audit guide and are prepared to harden the examples before production use. Do not print or log private signing keys, redact sensitive fields before sending audit events, verify signatures explicitly, secure local buffers with restrictive permissions and encryption, and confirm GreenHelix data handling, retention, and regulatory suitability with compliance counsel.
SKILL.md:183Ed25519 Private Signing Key Exposed Through Standard Output
SKILL.md:590Unrestricted Function Arguments and Exception Data Sent to an External Audit API
SKILL.md:986Sensitive Audit Events Buffered in Plaintext with Insufficient Filesystem Protections
Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
### EU AI Act (Effective August 2, 2026)
The EU AI Act classifies AI systems that autonomously execute financial transactions as **high-risk** under Annex III, Category 5(b). Article 14 imposes specific obligations on providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems:
- **Automatic logging** (Article 12): The system must automatically record events relevant to identifying risks, including each decision point, the inputs that triggered it, and the output action taken.
- **Tamper detection**: Logs must be designed so that unauthorized modification is detectable. A mutable database row does not satisfy this requirement.
Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
curl -X POST https://sandbox.greenhelix.net/v1 \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
import requests
API_BASE = "https://api.greenhelix.net/v1"
API_KEY = "your-api-key" # from /v1/register
def execute_tool(tool: str, input_data: dict) -> dict:
Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
import requests
API_BASE = "https://api.greenhelix.net/v1"
API_KEY = "your-api-key" # from /v1/register
def execute_tool(tool: str, input_data: dict) -> dict:
Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
import requests
API_BASE = "https://api.greenhelix.net/v1"
API_KEY = "your-api-key" # from /v1/register
def execute_tool(tool: str, input_data: dict) -> dict:
Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
API_KEY = "your-api-key" # from /v1/register
def execute_tool(tool: str, input_data: dict) -> dict:
response = requests.post(
f"{API_BASE}/v1",
headers={
"Authorization": f"Bearer {API_KEY}",
Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
PAYLOAD='{"order_id":"ORD-001","symbol":"ETH/USD","side":"buy","quantity":"10.5","price":"1842.30","order_type":"limit","timestamp_us":1717200000000000}'
SIGNATURE=$(echo -n "$PAYLOAD" | openssl pkeyutl -sign -inkey ed25519_private.pem | base64 -w0)
curl -X POST https://sandbox.greenhelix.net/v1 \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
# Build chain
curl -X POST https://sandbox.greenhelix.net/v1 \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
The guide explicitly claims the compliance validator checks Ed25519 signatures, but the implementation only checks event presence, timestamp types, and chain verification. This creates a false assurance gap: operators may believe integrity/authenticity is being validated when forged or malformed events could pass the documented validation flow.
The BaFin formatter hard-codes German field names and explicitly states that BaFin reports require German-language summary sections. This imposes a specific language/locale in the skill content without presenting a user choice or opt-in, which matches the natural-language language/locale policy violation criteria.
The docstring describes sec_worm_verification as running verification and logging the result, implying a normal compliance-verification record. The code instead emits a trade.system_error event with error_type set to compliance_verification, which contradicts the event's documented purpose elsewhere as an unhandled exception/system error record.
No suspicious patterns detected.