T07 · Tool Hijacking and Spoofing
- Location
scripts/report_writing_oil.py:16- Finding
External Import Path Allows Packaged Workflow Code to Be Replaced
- Content
View full analysis
- Remediation
View remediation
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This skill looks like a report-generation scaffold, but it misrepresents simulated research actions as successful and includes an unsafe external code import path.
Treat this as a review-needed scaffold, not a reliable production skill. Do not enter sensitive research-site credentials or rely on the generated financial analysis until the external import path is removed, real authentication and download verification are implemented, placeholder/demo behavior is clearly labeled, and output paths and retention are explicitly user-controlled.
scripts/report_writing_oil.py:16External Import Path Allows Packaged Workflow Code to Be Replaced
scripts/report_writing_workflow_v103.py:184Authentication and Download Operations Report Success Without Performing or Verifying the Operations
The file consistently presents the skill’s user-facing behavior in Chinese, including interaction steps such as asking the user for report requirements and save locations. There is no indication that the user can choose another language or that the Chinese-only behavior is a justified region-specific constraint, which may violate language/locale policy.
The skill explicitly instructs use of provided credentials to log into a third-party research website, but it gives no warning about how credentials are collected, transmitted, stored, or whether they should be scoped to least privilege. In a browser-automation workflow, unclear credential handling increases the risk of accidental exposure in logs, prompts, screenshots, or persisted automation state.
The natural-language instructions and reporting workflow are presented entirely in Chinese, including the report-writing guidance, with no indication that the user may choose another language. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a locale-policy violation unless clearly justified.
The document's security note states '不执行任何JavaScript代码或可疑脚本' at L53, implying the workflow should avoid JavaScript execution. However, the earlier login step at L08 requires handling CAPTCHA or security verification, which on modern websites generally depends on JavaScript-driven page logic and challenge execution, creating a contradiction in the documented intent.
This code prints status messages in Chinese and generates the final report and README entirely in Chinese, while the file contains no user opt-in, language selection, or justification that the skill is region-specific. That creates a natural-language locale policy issue because the skill imposes a specific language on all users by default.
The script falsely reports successful authentication, searching, filtering, and report downloading even though it only simulates those steps and writes placeholder metadata files. This is dangerous because downstream users or automation may trust the output as genuine research provenance, leading to deceptive reporting, bad decisions, and integrity failures in environments that rely on accurate collection and auditability.
This Python file prints all user-facing status messages in Chinese, which imposes a specific language on the user. The file does not offer any locale selection, fallback, or opt-in mechanism, so it violates the language/locale policy criterion for natural-language policy violations.
User-facing strings for the core workflow steps are fixed in Chinese, and several prompts and status messages elsewhere are also Chinese-only. This imposes a specific language on users without opt-in or documented justification, which matches the locale/language policy violation category.
The top-level docstring describes a complete automated workflow including authentication, content search/filtering, report identification, and analysis synthesis. In implementation, login_to_website merely sleeps and returns True (L184-L192), search_content returns an empty list placeholder (L194-L204), and generate_analysis_report writes mostly static markdown with placeholder analysis text (L255-L285, L335-L337).
The workflow step names are hard-coded in Chinese, and the rest of the user-facing prompts throughout the script are also presented only in Chinese. This imposes a single language on users without any opt-in or language-selection mechanism, which matches the language/locale policy violation criteria.
The natural-language instructions and examples are entirely in Chinese, and the file does not indicate that language selection is optional or that the skill is intended only for a Chinese-language environment. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a locale/language policy issue.
The skill directs downloading files to a local directory and saving generated PDFs, but it does not clearly warn that it will create local files or describe where data will be written and retained. This can lead to unintended persistence of potentially sensitive research data on the host system, especially when the default location is the desktop.
The guide directs saving downloaded files to a specific local directory but does not mention user consent, overwrite protection, path validation, or storage limits. In an agent setting, uncontrolled local writes can lead to accidental overwriting of files, cluttering sensitive directories, or writing data to an inappropriate location on the host.
The docstring for generate_analysis_report says it generates an analysis report and the code constructs a .pdf filename, which implies PDF output. However, the implementation explicitly replaces the .pdf suffix with .md and writes Markdown content to that file, so the documented/output intent contradicts actual behavior.
No suspicious patterns detected.