Back to skill

Security audit

要件事实证据对应

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a text-only Chinese legal evidence-mapping skill with no executable behavior, persistence, credential access, or hidden data flow.

Install only if you want Chinese-language legal evidence-mapping assistance. Treat outputs as drafting support, confirm the applicable jurisdiction and legal basis, and have a qualified legal professional review case strategy before relying on it.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
88% confidence
Finding

A Chinese-only mandatory skill without language choice or documented locale constraints can cause misunderstanding, mistranslation, or inaccessible legal output for users who operate in another language. In a legal workflow, such ambiguity is materially risky because users may rely on incorrectly understood burden-of-proof allocations, evidentiary categories, or litigation strategy.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The trigger phrases are broad enough to match many ordinary legal-assistance requests, which can cause the skill to activate outside its intended scope. Over-broad activation can route users into a rigid evidence-mapping workflow when they wanted general legal information, increasing the risk of irrelevant, incomplete, or overconfident legal guidance in a high-stakes domain.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.