不确定法律概念深挖

深入分析法条中的不确定法律概念（如"合理期限"、"重大误解"、"明显不当"）的内涵、外延、裁判标准和边界案例。当用户想穿透法条中模糊词汇的具体含义时使用。

Security Scan

This instruction-only skill simply guides the agent to analyze vague legal concepts from a provided statute and asks for no credentials, binaries, or installs — its requests align with its stated purpose.

Purpose & Capability

The name and description (

Instruction Scope

SKILL.md confines the agent to analyzing a user-provided law article and a concept word, producing judgment criteria, boundary cases, and pitfalls. It does not instruct reading system files, accessing external credentials, or transmitting data to unknown endpoints. It includes a sensible caution to verify cited cases on the public judgments database.

Install Mechanism

There is no install spec and no code files — the skill is instruction-only. No downloads, packages, or binary requirements are present, so nothing will be written to disk or installed by this skill.

Credentials

The skill declares no environment variables, no primary credential, and no config paths. There are no disproportionate requests for secrets or cross-service credentials.

Persistence & Privilege

Flags are default (not always:true). The skill is user-invocable and may be called autonomously per platform defaults, which is expected and proportionate for an analysis skill. It does not ask to modify other skills or system settings.

Assessment

This skill is internally coherent and low-risk because it only asks you to provide a statute and a concept word and returns structured legal analysis. Before using it: (1) don't paste confidential or personally identifying documents — provide only the statute text and de-identified facts; (2) remember the output is analytic guidance, not legal advice — verify citations and case law on official sources (the SKILL.md already suggests using 裁判文书网); (3) check jurisdiction — legal terms often vary by jurisdiction and the skill does not automatically detect applicable law; (4) if you need binding legal advice, consult a licensed attorney. If you want stronger guarantees about source citations, ask the skill to include citations (case IDs, links) and to state jurisdiction explicitly.

不确定法律概念深挖 (Legal Concept Deep Dive)

触发场景

• 用户指出法条中某个词不确定其具体含义（如"合理"、"重大"、"明显"）
• 用户说"什么叫重大误解"、"合理期限到底是多久"、"这个概念怎么界定"
• 用户想了解某个法律概念的裁判标准和边界案例

核心提示词

在【法条编号+法条内容】中，出现了"XXX"这一不确定法律概念。

请从以下角度深入分析：
1. 立法原意：该概念在本条中要解决什么问题？
2. 学理通说：学界主流观点如何界定该概念的内涵和外延？
3. 司法解释：最高法是否有相关司法解释或指导意见对此作出细化？
4. 裁判标准：实务中法官通常从哪几个维度去判断？请列出判断要素清单
5. 边界案例：请举出2个"刚好构成"和2个"刚好不构成"的典型情形
6. 常见误区：实务中对该概念最容易犯的理解错误是什么？

使用方式

使用时需提供：

1. 法条编号和内容
2. 要深挖的概念词（从 legal-structural-analysis-mctmilk 的结果中获取）

输出要求

1. 判断要素清单：实务中法官判断该概念的具体维度
2. 边界案例：正反各2个，共4个典型情形，帮助用户理解概念边界
3. 常见误区：提示实务中最容易踩的坑

示例

输入：《民法典》第147条 重大误解

输出应包含：

• 误解的对象范围（意思表示本身 vs 动机）
• 与动机错误的区分标准
• 与欺诈的界限
• 裁判中的高频争议点

注意事项

• 不确定法律概念是庭审交锋的焦点，边界案例尤为重要
• 如果AI分析的案例，务必提醒用户去裁判文书网验证