Back to skill

Security audit

Video Script Pacing Reviewer

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a markdown-only review skill for assessing video or PPT script pacing, with no commands, credential access, persistence, or hidden data movement.

Before installing, consider whether a Chinese-first video pacing reviewer fits your workflow. It appears safe from an execution and data-access standpoint, but users should provide only the script or presentation content they actually want reviewed.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (4)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

This markdown file is written entirely in Chinese and does not indicate that the user can choose another language or that the content is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking audience. Under the policy rule for language or locale constraints, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
84% confidence
Finding

The file's title and all instructional content are written in Chinese, with no indication that users may choose another language or that the locale restriction is optional. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale constraint is documented and justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
97% confidence
Finding

This reference document presents all instructional content in Chinese and does not indicate any user opt-in, alternative language, or locale selection. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user choice is a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

This markdown file uses Chinese throughout and does not indicate that users may choose another language or that the content is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking audience. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.