Assess Me

认知状态审计：检查当前推理是否存在不确定性、矛盾或盲点。 当用户质疑（"你确定吗"、"再检查"、"review"）、工具结果异常或为空、 或修复后需验证完整性时，必须使用此 Skill。 关键词：你确定吗、再检查、review、verify、审计、double check、检查完整性。 即使用户没有明确说"审计"，只要用户质疑你的判断或工具返回意外结果，都应触发。

Assess Me — Self-Cognition Audit

Triggers

触发源	可检测信号	行动
用户质疑	用户说"你确定吗"、"再检查"、"review"、"verify"、"确认一下"	执行 6 问审计，摊开假设和证据
工具异常	read_file/grep/exec 返回空值、报错、或明显不合理的结果	列出所有解读，追溯矛盾源
修复后验证	刚执行完修复步骤，需要确认完整性	检查修复是否覆盖根因，而非表面
需求模糊	用户指令可解读为多种互斥方式	列出所有解读，确认用户意图后再执行
未验证假设	推理链中依赖了未确认的前提条件	显式列出所有假设，逐个确认

没有以上信号不调。 assess-me 是认知审计，不是常规工具。

Action

Write your current thinking state to a temp file, then read it back.

1. Answer 6 questions and write to a temp file

2. Read it back

3. Critically analyze what you wrote

4. Continue based on the findings

5. 验证: 此 skill 没有独立的 Verification 章节。检查第 3 步的分析是否全面、是否有遗漏的盲点。如果有，补充分析。

Questions

1. Goal — What is the task? What does "done" look like?
2. Progress — What's done? What's pending?
3. Gaps — What information do you need but don't have?
4. Assumptions — What unverified beliefs are driving your approach?
5. Blocker — What specifically is blocking you? (exact obstacle, not symptom)
6. Recovery — If stuck, what should you do differently?

Instructions

text

Write tool → /tmp/assess-me.md
Content:
# Assess Me

**Goal:** <1-2 sentences>
**Progress:** <1-2 sentences>
**Gaps:** <1-2 sentences>
**Assumptions:** <1-2 sentences>
**Blocker:** <1-2 sentences>
**Recovery:** <1-2 sentences>

After writing, use Read tool to read /tmp/assess-me.md back. Then review critically:

• Is "progress" just restating effort without results?
• Are blockers specific or vague?
• Is "Recovery" a concrete action, or just "keep trying"?
• Are you assuming something without evidence?

Pitfalls

• Assumptions section must NOT be empty — there are always assumptions
• Recovery ≠ "keep trying" — name a specific next action
• Vague blocker = you haven't found it yet
• Read the file back — writing without re-reading skips the detachment effect

Output Convention

When done, summarize findings inline:

text

[assess]
Goal: ...
Blocker: ...
Next: ...
[/assess]

Verification

• The critical review covers all 6 questions: Goal, Progress, Gaps, Assumptions, Blocker, Recovery
• "Progress" identifies results, not just effort
• Blockers are specific, not vague
• "Recovery" names a concrete next action, not "keep trying"
• Assumptions are surfaced and examined
• Any blind spots found were supplemented with analysis
• Self-optimization: 此 Skill 可自我进化。
  • Verification 未通过 → 加载 skill-manager 修复：修正步骤、补充边界情况、修复 bug
  • Verification 全部通过 → 加载 skill-manager 优化：简化步骤、增强执行确定性、改进验证标准

---

Source: https://github.com/MaoChen1980/think-skills