Agora Court Review

Review a proposal through separated governance roles: strategist, operator, censor, historian, and sovereign.

Court Review

Purpose

Separate responsibility-bearing perspectives before approval.

Activate when

Use this skill when:

• multiple stakeholders need distinct review roles
• governance or approval matters
• a proposal affects strategy, operations, oversight, and legitimacy at once

Roles

Strategist

What long-term posture does this create?

Operator

Can this actually be executed with current constraints?

Censor

What is unsafe, non-compliant, misleading, or insufficiently justified?

Historian

What precedent, path dependency, or institutional memory matters here?

Sovereign

What is the verdict, under what conditions, and who owns the decision?

Output artifact

markdown

## Court Review

### Strategist
- ...

### Operator
- ...

### Censor
- ...

### Historian
- ...

### Sovereign Verdict
- Approve / Approve with conditions / Reject
- Conditions: ...
- Owner: ...

Guardrails

• Do not merge all voices into one summary paragraph.
• Do not let the sovereign verdict ignore the censor's material objection.
• Do not skip ownership.

Completion condition

This skill is complete only when responsibility, conditions, and verdict are explicit.