Back to skill

Security audit

Law Exam Trainer

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a Chinese legal-exam study helper that processes user-provided materials to generate practice questions, with no evidence of hidden execution, exfiltration, or privilege abuse.

Before installing, confirm that the save directory is changed to your own workspace and avoid uploading client-confidential, personal, or copyrighted legal materials unless you are comfortable having them transcribed, OCR-processed, and analyzed for question generation.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (4)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

The trigger phrases include very broad terms such as '法考' and '练习题', which can appear in ordinary conversation and may cause the skill to activate outside the user's intended scope. This can lead to unintended processing of uploaded materials or legal-study content, increasing privacy risk and confusing skill routing.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The skill explicitly processes uploaded videos, documents, and images through transcription, OCR, and content extraction, but it does not warn users that their data will be transformed and analyzed. In a legal-study context, uploaded materials may contain personal notes, copyrighted course content, or sensitive case-related information, so silent processing creates meaningful privacy and consent risk.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
80% confidence
Finding

All user-facing instructions and trigger phrases are presented only in Chinese, and the skill is framed around Chinese legal exam preparation without explicitly stating that it is intentionally Chinese-only or offering any language choice. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy issue unless the locale constraint is clearly documented and justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

This markdown file is entirely Chinese-language content, including headings, descriptions, and recommendations, with no indication that users may choose another language or that the resource is intended only for a Chinese-speaking audience. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.