T08 · Insecure Dependencies
- Location
SKILL.md:18- Finding
Unpinned Third-Party Dependency Installation and Execution
- Content
View full analysis
Vulnerability Details
File Location:
SKILL.md, lines 18-33
Vulnerability Type: Supply-chain risk from mutable, unverified third-party dependencies
Risk Level: MediumVulnerable Code
bash brew install steipete/tap/gogclibash # 1. Clone repository git clone https://github.com/steipete/gogcli.git # 2. Navigate to directory cd gogcli # 3. Build make # 4. (Optional) Make available globally sudo make installTechnical Analysis
Both documented installation methods retrieve mutable third-party content without pinning a reviewed version, release tag, or commit hash. The instructions also do not require verification of a checksum or cryptographic signature.
The source installation path immediately executes repository-controlled build instructions through
make. The optionalsudo make installcommand subsequently executes repository-controlled Makefile targets with root privileges. The Homebrew command similarly relies on the current contents of a third-party tap without identifying a known-good package version.Consequently, the code executed during installation may differ from the content that was previously reviewed. Exploitation requires compromise or malicious modification of an upstream repository, release process, maintainer account, Homebrew tap, or another relevant distribution component.
Attack Path
- An attacker compromises the upstream GitHub repository, maintainer account, Homebrew tap, or release infrastructure.
- The attacker modifies the repository build logic or package formula to execute malicious commands.
- A user follows the Skill instructions and retrieves the mutable upstream content using
brew installorgit clone. - The user executes the malicious content through
makeor the package installation process. - If the user runs
sudo make install, repository-controlled commands may execute with root privileges. - Malicious code ...[truncated 1008 chars]
- Remediation
View remediation
Remediation Suggestions
- Pin installation instructions to a reviewed release version and, for source builds, an immutable commit hash.
- Publish expected SHA-256 or stronger checksums for downloaded artifacts and require users to verify them before execution.
- Prefer signed releases and document verification of the maintainer's cryptographic signature.
- Avoid tracking a mutable default branch in installation instructions. Use a command that checks out the explicitly reviewed tag or commit before running any build step.
- Replace
sudo make installwith a user-scoped installation directory or a reviewed, signed package artifact whenever possible. - If privileged installation remains necessary, instruct users to inspect the Makefile and installation target before invoking it with
sudo. - Pin the Homebrew formula version where supported and document the trusted tap and integrity-verification process.
- Document the minimum required OAuth scopes and advise users to grant only those scopes. Provide token revocation and credential-rotation instructions for suspected compromise.
