ClawHub
Back to skill

Security audit

简历优化技能

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a resume-optimization guidance skill with no executable code, persistence, hidden data handling, or privilege-seeking behavior.

This skill appears safe to install for resume and job-description matching tasks. Users should remember that resumes contain personal data and should only provide information they are comfortable sharing in the current chat; the skill itself instructs the agent not to save or leak that content.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding
The description and trigger section say to use the skill whenever a user wants to 'optimize/modify/improve a resume,' which are broad natural phrases that can appear in many ordinary conversations. The file does not provide a constrained trigger list, contextual limits, or negative examples to clarify when the skill should not activate.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Confidence
87% confidence
Finding
All user-facing instructions, examples, and behavior descriptions are in Chinese, and the file does not state that language is optional or limited to a specific regional context. This can amount to a language-policy violation if the skill implicitly forces one language without user opt-in.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.