Natural-Language Policy Violations
- Category
- Not specified by scanner
- Confidence
- 88% confidence
- Finding
文件从标题开始即全部以中文呈现,未说明这是面向特定中文地区用户的限定场景,也未提供其他语言或用户选择。根据规则,未获用户同意而强制单一语言属于自然语言政策风险。
- Content
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a disclosed investment-analysis checklist with no network, credential, persistence, or trading capability, but its investment recommendations should be treated cautiously.
Review the investment outputs as a checklist, not as instructions to buy, hold, or sell. The skill does not trade, access accounts, or send data externally, but its simplified scoring and directive recommendations can still be misleading without independent research or professional advice.
文件从标题开始即全部以中文呈现,未说明这是面向特定中文地区用户的限定场景,也未提供其他语言或用户选择。根据规则,未获用户同意而强制单一语言属于自然语言政策风险。
The skill gives affirmative long-term holding guidance such as '建议:长期持有' and frames a pass/fail investment test, but it does not include a clear, prominent disclaimer that the output is not financial advice and may materially affect user finances. In an investment context, users may over-rely on this simplified framework and make consequential portfolio decisions without understanding the limitations, uncertainty, or need for professional advice.
The file's top-level description and all user-facing guidance are written exclusively in Chinese, presenting the skill as operating in that language by default. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale constraint is explicitly justified, which is not present here.
The recommendation labels, action guidance, and printed usage instructions are all hardcoded Chinese strings shown to the user. Because the skill does not offer a language choice or state a justified region-specific constraint, this enforces a specific language on all users.
The entire template is written in Chinese and does not indicate that users may choose another language or locale. Under the policy rule for language/locale, this is a natural-language policy issue unless the locale restriction is explicitly justified or optional.
The script claims to print a usable '使用说明', including the instruction on line L168, but that line uses unescaped nested double quotes and makes the module fail to parse before it can run. This is an intent-code divergence because the code presents runtime guidance that the program cannot actually deliver in its current form.
No suspicious patterns detected.