T08 · Insecure Dependencies
- Location
SKILL.md:20- Finding
Unpinned Third-Party Package Installation
- Content
View full analysis
Vulnerability Details
File Location:
SKILL.md, lines 20–22
Vulnerability Type: Unpinned and unaudited third-party dependency
Risk Level: Mediumbash pip install web2mdTechnical Analysis
The Skill directs users to install
web2mdfrom the configured Python package index without specifying an exact version, cryptographic hash, verified publisher, or canonical source repository. Consequently, the installed artifact may change after the Skill has been reviewed.This creates a supply-chain trust boundary: installation and subsequent CLI execution run third-party code with the invoking user's privileges. A compromised package publisher, malicious future release, or package-index substitution could therefore introduce attacker-controlled code. The repository contains no implementation files with which to verify the package behavior described in
SKILL.md.Attack Path
- An attacker compromises the package publisher account, package distribution infrastructure, or another relevant dependency supply-chain component.
- The attacker publishes a malicious release under the
web2mdpackage name. - A user follows the Skill's unpinned
pip install web2mdinstruction. - Pip resolves and installs the attacker-controlled release from the configured package index.
- Malicious code executes during installation or when the user invokes the installed
web2mdcommand. - The code operates with the permissions of the invoking user and can access resources available to that account.
Impact Assessment
Successful exploitation could permit arbitrary code execution with the invoking user's privileges. Depending on the execution environment, this may expose readable files, environment variables, URL lists, generated documents, local service endpoints, and credentials accessible to that user. It could also allow modification of user-owned files and outbound network communication. The Skill itself does no ...[truncated 120 chars]
- Remediation
View remediation
Remediation Suggestions
- Pin the dependency to a specifically reviewed version rather than installing the latest available release.
- Publish the package's canonical repository, package-index page, and verified publisher identity so users can validate provenance.
- Supply a lock file or requirements file containing cryptographic hashes, and install with hash enforcement such as
pip install --require-hashes -r requirements.txt. - Re-review the package and its transitive dependencies before updating the pinned version.
- Recommend installation inside a dedicated virtual environment or similarly isolated runtime under a non-privileged account.
- Where practical, use signed releases, attestations, or a trusted internal package mirror that only contains reviewed artifacts.
